K. Lee Lerner
Goodreads Author
Born
The United States
Website
Twitter
Genre
Member Since
August 2011
![]() |
Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence and Security, 3 volume set
by
2 editions
—
published
2003
—
|
|
![]() |
Social Issues Primary Sources Collection
by
—
published
2005
|
|
![]() |
Biotechnology: Changing Life Through Science (Agriculture, Volume 2)
by
2 editions
—
published
2006
—
|
|
![]() |
The Gale Encyclopedia of Science, Volume 2: Charge-coupled device - Eye
by
—
published
2003
|
|
![]() |
Human and Civil Rights: Essential Primary Sources
by
—
published
2006
|
|
![]() |
Scientific Thought: In Context, 3 Volume set
by
2 editions
—
published
2007
—
|
|
![]() |
Crime and Punishment: Essential Primary Sources
—
published
2006
|
|
![]() |
Immigration and Multiculturalism: Essential Primary Sources
—
published
2006
|
|
![]() |
Family in Society: Essential Primary Sources
by
—
published
2006
|
|
![]() |
The Gale Encyclopedia of Science, Volume 4: Lacewings - Pharmacogenetics
by |
|
K.’s Recent Updates
K. Lerner
is now following Harvard OpenScholar's reviews
|
|
“Facts count. Conspiracy theories, usually the refuge of the bitter or disempowered, range from factually challenged to wildly hallucinogenic. Conspiracy theories are not harmless entertainment, or a laudable facet of the freedom of speech. Conspiracy theories do both overt and tacit harm. Dangerous when they deal with public health issues, at a minimum, almost all are insults to the integrity of thousands of hard-working and honest people. In the extreme, conspiracy theories slander entire races, nations, or cultures.”
― Social Issues Primary Sources Collection
― Social Issues Primary Sources Collection
“Pseudoscience is almost always recognizable from a distance, and easy to confirm on close examination. Science is, however, not immune from hubris, and bad science can be tougher to spot. Those of us who make a living from science or science media must display scientific integrity. We must constantly test our assumptions and fight the siren song of consensus when our data tells us to be contrarian. We must remain independent of political or religious bias in evaluating our work. We must admit when we are wrong, and remain willing to evolve when verifiable data demands change. We must admit when we are uncertain, remain humble in advances, and offer courageous and independent advice grounded in science.”
―
―
“Pseudoscience often relies on a witches' brew of scientific terms (e.g. "wavelength," "energy fields," "vibrations") half-baked into simplistic metaphors that do not correspond with testable reality. In some cases, pseudoscience simply relies on language that is deliberately vague and poorly defined to deceive. While outright lunacy is almost always easy to spot, the most dangerous of pseudoscientific meanderings are those filled with scientific terminology that, even for experts, can initially be daunting and impressive. Upon dissection, however, the terminology is invariably found to be misused, or used in a context far from accepted understanding. However convincing and artful, however much we may even wish the conclusions to be true, monuments built in such shifting sands cannot withstand the inevitable tests of time.”
―
―
Topics Mentioning This Author
topics | posts | views | last activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hooked on Books : Richard's 2024 Challenge Tracker | 361 | 139 | Jun 12, 2025 08:45AM |
“Humor and wit are the universal solvents of the serious and the scholarly.”
― Government, Politics, and Protest:: Essential Primary Sources
― Government, Politics, and Protest:: Essential Primary Sources
“There is unspeakable yet entirely preventable suffering in this world. The job of journalists and writers engaged with global issues is to articulate the unspeakable and give voice to solutions. -- K. Lee Lerner”
― Infectious Diseases: In Context
― Infectious Diseases: In Context
“Pseudoscience is almost always recognizable from a distance, and easy to confirm on close examination. Science is, however, not immune from hubris, and bad science can be tougher to spot. Those of us who make a living from science or science media must display scientific integrity. We must constantly test our assumptions and fight the siren song of consensus when our data tells us to be contrarian. We must remain independent of political or religious bias in evaluating our work. We must admit when we are wrong, and remain willing to evolve when verifiable data demands change. We must admit when we are uncertain, remain humble in advances, and offer courageous and independent advice grounded in science.”
―
―
“Pseudoscience often relies on a witches' brew of scientific terms (e.g. "wavelength," "energy fields," "vibrations") half-baked into simplistic metaphors that do not correspond with testable reality. In some cases, pseudoscience simply relies on language that is deliberately vague and poorly defined to deceive. While outright lunacy is almost always easy to spot, the most dangerous of pseudoscientific meanderings are those filled with scientific terminology that, even for experts, can initially be daunting and impressive. Upon dissection, however, the terminology is invariably found to be misused, or used in a context far from accepted understanding. However convincing and artful, however much we may even wish the conclusions to be true, monuments built in such shifting sands cannot withstand the inevitable tests of time.”
―
―
“Facts count. Conspiracy theories, usually the refuge of the bitter or disempowered, range from factually challenged to wildly hallucinogenic. Many conspiracy theories do both overt and tacit harm. Almost all are insults, intended or unintended, are insults to thousands of hard-working and honest people, and sometimes to entire races, nations, or cultures.”
―
―

Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more