TheKeyAuthor's Blog - Posts Tagged "non-fiction"

Out of context the audio recording (video) is of little consequence. However, I just wanted to show you that I do indeed have some of the evidence I claim and that it is of a serious nature. Destroying incriminating data at the Royal Courts of Justice, the High Court of Britain, is an outrage. It was all part of the cover-up.

The book The Key? outlines the case for the prosecution. The defendants are heads of government, senior police officers, senior politicians, lawyers, barristers, judges, the media, and legal and political regulators.

Bank rate rigging and phone hacking scandals are shining the light on how the Western world really works. If my story came to the attention of the public, then another scandal must surely break out. Trading in children is far more gut-wrenching than dodgy trading in derivatives or spicy celebrity stories. That it was done by those we entrust to uphold the law makes it shocking if not nauseating.

My book will offend your senses. If you think about it, we have been brainwashed from birth that our legal systems are the best in the world. I can assure you that you will resist the real truth, because it is too painful to accept. It will make you feel insecure and troubled. The safe world that you thought you knew is not what it seems at all.

If enough members of the ordinary public find out about what goes on, then pressure can be put on the authorities to change the system. That is the only solution and why I am asking for awareness support.

The Olympic Ceremony celebrated British life and traditions last night.

Why didn't we see a cameo about UK judges and barristers abducting children and the British police, politicians and media covering it up?

They should have got a posse of judges, in full wig and regalia getup, snatch the children out of their beds, wrap them in the foreign flags of the competing nations and ceremoniously hand them over to foreign dignitaries with distraught and pleading parents crawling on hands and knees begging behind them.

This was a show about the life of ordinary British people after all.

Hillsborough cover-up observation: But when there are well-founded suspicions of a cover-up by the authorities, the pure disclosure of the raw information can be the crucial remedy. This is the key point...when...he persuaded the Labour government to establish the panel in 2009.

Yet a year later, both the government and opposition worked together to stop public criticism. It happened while I was writing The Key? and forced anonymity upon my family.

Anonymity is derived from the Greek word ἀνωνυμία, anonymia, meaning "without a name." And that status has made disclosure of the raw information an almost impossible one, as intended.

From you book it seems that the more complex the system in which they operate the more freedom they have to escape exposure and criticism.

The more layers the more levels of protection and opportunities to promote (lure) those that exhibit the desired qualities. The greater the number of groups, the greater the cumulative power. Eventually this leads to impunity: game over.

The Key? explains the role the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) plays in blocking justice. Again we have another example and again they are protecting the police. It is a scandal. The CPS are a significant factor in why impunity reigns supreme. The CPS are quite simply corrupt.

The following comment to this recent article supports the 2000 figure I questioned in my book. "...between 1991 and 2011, 2000 people died in Police Custody, and not one Police Officer has been charged, not even with Neglect of Duty, it is unconceivable [sic] to think that all these people died on natural causes while in Police Custody"

A recent observation:

Another bit that stood out and made me think on your situation was this; power, ultimate power is not the elimination of your enemies but the elimination of doubt among your own people. V for Vendetta

If they do not doubt you, then you can do what you like. All you need is the confidence of the majority. That way those in the minority who speak out are hardly heard, their voices become stifled, muffled or distorted by the majority. Like you, you're a minority, a voice they are trying to stifle, to silence. They did that by taking your identity, but you cast doubt on them, and the more who read your words the more doubt you spread, and they lose ground. Every now and again there is a voice that stands out, who makes real change. Today they are known as pioneers of history, I do not need to name them, they are already in our heads. But no matter who you think of that made change, in their own time they were anything BUT pioneers. They were radicals, traitors, rebels, crazy or just simply a menace to society. And now you have to ask your readers who will they be in the end, the menace or the bystanders (society)?

"I couldn't sleep that night. I kept thinking about the unexplainable events that I had been involved in. Being a mathematician, I started to consider probabilities. V for Vendetta was released in March 2006 after a five-month delay. The “My Ashmolean My Museum” series of portrait photographs were exhibited from 12 May 2009 to promote the grand opening in November 2009. I normally only watch a film once. The scene with the maxim [Defend the children of the poor and punish the wrongdoer] was fleeting and could easily be missed in a blink of an eye. I don't know when the portraits were put on the Internet, but if I'd seen the film before then, I wouldn't have seen the picture. How many people have words written on their face for photographs anyway? The odds on finding that maxim and then finding it written on Chakrabarti's face posing as Lady Justice while I was in the middle of writing a letter addressed to her are quite simply astronomical — try it yourself: pick an issue that has been on your mind recently; select seven people you would like to discuss it with if you could; over the next twenty-four hours, select a phrase or some words that you have never come across that really connects you to the issue; then check the Internet to see if those words are derived from ancient religious scriptures and are written, word for word, on the faces of any of the people you chose and that person works towards its meaning and poses in a way identical to the source of the phrase or words you found." The Key?

The House of Commons (British Parliament) 2009 summer recess lasted from 21 July 2009 to 12 October 2009. I emailed my MEP during that period and predicted the Minister for Europe would be sacked. On 13th October 2009, the day after the House returned, the sacking was duly announced in the Press.

The sacking of the Minister for Europe was not your average dismissal as the following extract from my book indicates:

My post that day contained a letter from MEP Glenys Kinnock. It seemed Mrs Kinnock and not Eluned Morgan MEP had stepped forward to deal with my issues. I was pleased about that development because Glenys Kinnock was a household name in Britain. I had seen her on television and heard about her for the best part of two decades.

Glenys Kinnock came to real prominence when her husband, Lord Kinnock, was leader of the Labour Party from 1983 to 1992. She was one of the first wives of a political leader in Britain to take a leading role in politics. She had been an MEP for Wales since 1994. During his US presidential campaign, Senator Joe Biden had famously plagiarised Neil Kinnock's speech in 1987 and since then, they had become firm friends. Barack Obama had recently picked Joe Biden to be his vice-presidential running mate in the race for the White House. Like the Blairs and the Clintons, when you have been in politics for a long time, I guess you get to know everybody. Glenys Kinnock knew Cherie Blair very well and quite likely Hillary Clinton, both of whom had helped Lady Meyer.
...
The position of Europe Minister had also been downgraded: the new incumbent wasn't allowed to sit at cabinet meetings; it was the first time in recent memory that the post wasn't held by a Minister of State;...

While the Baroness held the position of Europe Minister, the political elite could offer no excuses:

The post of Minister of State for Europe was seen as the most important outside of the full cabinet and it entitled the holder to attend cabinet meetings. Baroness Kinnock could indeed talk to Jack Straw and Gordon Brown and raise my issues within the most powerful circle of politicians in the land....Therefore, along with Chancellor Merkel, Secretary Clinton, ambassadors, the Prime Minister and the Lord Chancellor, we had the leader of the Conservative Party, the leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, a UKIP MEP, two British newspapers, a human rights group and two other national charities that had all been informed of illegal child abduction and Baroness Kinnock knew all about it. Consequently, they knew there could be no excuses whatsoever for the Baroness to do nothing or for the Prime Minister and the Lord Chancellor not to know my allegations had substance. Therefore, there were no excuses why leaders of the other main political groups, UKIP, Liberty or the Press couldn't ask difficult questions of the government, as you would expect in a functional democracy, yet there wasn't a murmur from anyone.

Her sacking has profound implications:

They were obliged to give Baroness Kinnock another Foreign Office ministerial job because her husband, Lord Kinnock, resigned after four-and-a-half years as head of the British Council due to a conflict of interests when she became a Foreign Office [Europe] minister in June. Baroness Kinnock, a long-time campaigner on African issues, took over the much less prestigious post of Minister for Africa because Lord Malloch Brown resigned. As Minister for Africa, my issues were not part of her remit and she wouldn't be attending regularly at cabinet meetings. So, that all worked out rather nicely.
The main question in the Press was an obvious one: if Baroness Kinnock was the right woman for such an important job four months ago, why was she the wrong woman now? Of her seventeen predecessors, only one had served less time than she did, but he was promoted to Defence Secretary. Her sacking was even more bemusing when you consider that Parliament had been in recess from 21 July 2009 to 12 October 2009: she had only been in office during a sitting Parliament for seven weeks!
Although (some of) the Press and the public were puzzled at Kinnock's demise, I was not; I called it correctly several weeks ago in my email to John Bufton MEP: “unless Glenys Kinnock has done something I don't know about, I can't see how she could remain as a cabinet minister....
As I thought it through, I realised the implications were profound: it meant Gordon Brown knew about my issues, had directly engaged in protecting his government because of it and must have been at least aware of the cover-up. It also meant that if the other political parties continued to do nothing, then they were aiding the government in the cover-up, which made no sense to me whatsoever. Why would the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, UKIP, Liberty and the Press not want to kick up a fuss?

All the politicians, including the Baroness, will state her sacking had nothing to do with my case, but the circumstances strongly suggest otherwise. In a proper functioning democracy with a truly free and independent Press, the story should have been published to allow the public to make their own minds up, particularly as the General Election had to be called in a matter of months. But that never happened.