date
newest »


You can thank me by answering some unanswered questions about your books, here, on GoodReads (and for the love of all that is holy, I can't find a neat link to all the unanswered questions in one place; looks like you'd have to open the page for each book separately and look there...What a bother...).


Alternatively, you can skip Embers completely and just read the summary somewhere: i.e. Tyrion is a violent asshole that committed genocide against She'Har (they had it coming, though), then was promptly backstabbed by his own children, because he's a violent asshole. Embers are pretty dark and violent, as fantasy books go.
The plot elements from Embers influence Champions plotline (characters make references to She'Har, Illeniels and their plans and actions, all of which happen in Embers; and the ultimate Big Bad in Champions is an entity the existence of which was strongly hinted at in Embers), and Tyrion's personal plotline has disproportionately large influence on Riven Gates (you won't completely understand the motivations of one of the characters in Riven Gates, unless you know what happened in Embers).


Also, the author isn't keeping up with anything posted on Goodreads and hasn't answered any questions here for some time now. You are complaining in vain.

Anyway, I started with Illenials, then went to Mageborn & on from there & it's all flowing nicely.

Let's agree to disagree. That said, he was kind of an asshole (mass rapist, to be specific) even before he met any of the She'Har. And even his children (who helped him wipe out the She'Har) didn't like him. At all.
Whether it would have been possible to avoid a genocide, I don't know. She'Har were not evil per se, more like a case of Blue and Orange Morality. Centyrs certainly would have been a problem either way, that's for sure. Whereas Mr. T, for all of his antagonistic tendencies later on, was pretty mellow, which, I guess, was kind of the point. Which leads me to...
Teresa wrote: "Anyway, I started with Illenials, then went to Mageborn & on from there & it's all flowing nicely."
I would again strongly recommend anyone reading this to start with Mageborn 1-5, then Embers of Illeniel 1-3, not the other way around, no matter what the chronology says. Because: 1) The author intended it this way. 2) The framing story doesn't make sense if you read Embers before Mageborn. 3) Embers 1-3 contain lots of spoilers for Mageborn 1-5. Granted, I didn't read these books the way you did (if nothing else, simply because when I started with the series the Embers books weren't published yet), so I cannot fully appreciate the impact these spoilers would or wouldn't have on a reader. But I still stand by my advice.
Also, in "The Final Redemption" he tells Lyra that two thousands years have passed, give or take, and then that number gets repeated throughout the book whenever the age of things that date back to the fall of She'Har (the island, Tryrion's tree, etc) is mentioned.
Therefore, "Embers" were roughly 2000 years before "Mageborn", not 4000 years. I have no idea how you came up with a figure of four thousand.
For reference (this is not related to the matter at hand), The Sundering (that whole thing with Balinthor) happened roughly 1000 years before "Mageborn" (as explicitly stated by Moira and Gareth).