date
newest »



Yes, not a bad policy. It would be a shame if we all read the same things.

Which reminds me of the problem with narrow pools of influence, as James Ellroy has complained about in crime fiction and Michael Moorcock about in fantasy. Likewise, that infamous Hayao Miyazaki quote "anime was a mistake" was a bad translation of when he criticised the anime industry for largely being ran by people who ONLY watch anime and have very little experience with other televisual media. I sometimes wonder if the Neo-Decadent movement, which I know you through, risks succumbing to that on account of having a very clearly defined collection of influences: The core being late 19th/early 20th century modernist fiction, 1960's/1970's New Wave Science Fiction and classical Japanese literature. I've developed more of an interest in the first one precisely through the movement, but I hope that I don't get stuck in that as a comfort zone.
One reason I've returned to the US pulp crime fiction/film noir inspiration is that I can tell it's only a major influence for Salvattore Beteta. Even if the one book by Brendan Connell that I have read so far, "The Galaxy Club", is a novel in that style I can tell it's a deliberate outlier where Connell has decided to write something in a niche he usually doesn't have much to do with. Kinda forms a parallel to Thomas Pynchon's "Inherent Vice" now that I think of it, even if there were elements of parodying the classical American detective novel in "Vineland".
(come to think of it, I wonder if he was an influence on Brendan Connell when writing "The Galaxy Club"?)