message 1:
by
Rayna
(new)
Jan 15, 2025 02:37AM

reply
|
flag

You know what you did. This is just a transparent attempt to leverage your fanbase against your victims. You'll never get a penny from me ever again.

Ugh. What is wrong with you?!


I feel dirty because I use to be a fan and spent a lot of money on your books only to find out that you're just another abuser pretending to be a "nice guy".
Also, why exactly has Goodreads disabled reviewing on your most popular books? Did you ask them to do that? Why? You got to post your opinion here; are you worried the rest of us might as well?

- Tweet by Neil Gaiman (6:59 PM · Sep 28, 2018)

Tell me, how feministic is it of you to wield your power and money to quiet women who you allegedly abused? And how much have you warped Ash's mind by subjecting him to the things being reported? You can have whatever kinks you want, but you know full well that means that it happens with clear communication and expectations. Clearly that wasn't the case.
I'm disappointed. You writing all the beautiful stories and characters only shows that you know what a good person is like, but you CHOOSE not to be one.

There’s a reason why the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" exists. It's a cornerstone of fairness and justice.
Stay strong and rise above the noise of the narrow-minded crowd.
P.S. Still patiently awaiting The Seven Sisters :))


I would donate the books I have of yours but I don't feel comfortable other people picking them up. So trash it is; the same place that you belong.



Saying "I have never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity with anyone" is not much really, there's so much more that can go wrong beyond that, for many different reasons. If you are ready to take responsibility for your "missteps" as you say, the first thing would be to say sorry for whatever you did wrong, and this is not for you to judge, is for the victims to decide, so you need to listen to them, not to yourself.
Saying that almost nothing of what they say really happened, it's not a good sign, it's not what we expect of someone that's truly sorry.

👏👏👏

Meanwhile, whoever is not a story-reader but a simple brand consumer, please don't destroy your books, don't throw them away and, for no reason, don't burn them! If you don't want them give them to ones who appreciate good books and good storytelling.


Yikes? Politely pointing out that I am not perfect shocks you? Politely pointing out that I will continue to make blunders throughout my lifetime shocks you? Politely pointing out that I do not know the truth of the matter because I am not involved shocks you? Maybe hop down off that high horse.


Still missing my point. I'll try again. I was not there, neither were any of the commenters. I won't pass judgement on a situation I am not involved in. I don't think others should be either.

I believe there is no investigation, this is all that we get, the victims word and text messages, and Neil, admitting to most of it, except the crucial part

If there's no investigation then we can't really pass judgement at all. We can take sides with nothing but the words of strangers (a huge error and usually mandated by ideologies), or we can simply state opinions like "IF true is shameful". But we can't "take action" against someone without an actual investigation (even if done by a third party and not the justice department).
Neil admitted to some facts, but he also claims there are actual lies in what these women say. If from his perspective are lies, he won't admit to it, and that is fine. Now the problem lies (no pun intended) in: are the women confused or even lying? Or is Neil? We can't confirm or deny neither side because we do not KNOW any of the people involved.






I care about Gaiman's writings, which become mine as soon as I read them. The rest is a legal matter, which naturally affects all people directly involved, but that I keep totally separate from the work of an author and certainly doesn't affect my pleasure or displeasure in reading it.
By the way, the same applies to Heidegger, Oppenheimer, Sartre, Foucault, to name a few. With the difference that their precise biographical responsabilities have now been formally acknowledged, whereas Gaiman's have not, yet.
Until then, it's just gossip, which I don't engage in.

But I can't do that, because their accounts make more sense than yours.
I could do that I think if you owned unequivocally that you messed up, and aren't the one to say how badly, and then committed to a restorative justice process.
See Reid Mihalko modeling how it's done. Use a search engine for "Reid Mihalko" and "informing you about my accountability process".
Stop equivocating and denial. Own it, try to fix it as best you can, if you want to be respected again. Any amount of denial isn't helping you.


Not the only rational one.

I have a strong reflexive disgust and horror for accounts of sexual abuse, however, I’m not one to give in to the idiotic “the accusation is heinous, therefore the accused must be guilty” arguments we see way too often.
Nonetheless, this question still lingers in my mind:
How can so many unrelated women have fabricated these stories out of the blue, unless there is at least some shared nugget of truth to them, and something wrong really did happen?
Neil Gaiman is free to publish whatever thoughts he likes, but in this case, he leaves a lot to be desired in the way of clearing his name.
The accusations are strong and numerous, and much more than the contents of this blog post is warranted.
As I said, "Neil Gaiman is free to publish whatever thoughts he likes,” and if the same cannot be said for his accusers, then that is wrong and grossly unequal. Some commenters are speaking of NDAs. In a situation like this, if those aforesaid NDAs do actually exist, I think it is absolutely necessary that all of those NDAs be lifted, as they can only serve to protect Neil Gaiman and cruelly muzzle the potential victims. If Neil Gaiman truly wishes to appear innocent and/or magnanimous, this is the key first step.
I abide by “innocent until proven guilty,” but if I’m being honest, I’m struggling to decide whether I’ll ever consume any more of Neil Gaiman’s creations again.
This is a heartbreaking development, as I long thought of him as my favorite author, starting in childhood. (Stardust, Neverwhere, Sandman, etc.)
I’d love for this to be a big misunderstanding, but I’m suspending judgment and maintaining skepticism indefinitely.


-a former fan