message 1:
by
Marge
(new)
Feb 14, 2014 02:08PM

reply
|
flag


Gads! I ran screaming happily into the light after I got my M.A. and said "never again".


Funny thing is that i have read evr one of these books. Its sad that there are those that do not appreciate lit, but to each his own. I always have fun with the "Books I Hate" groups We all have books we don;t like, or authors. I have two, very famous and well liked authors that i hate
BTW i laughed so hard at this i nearly puked. Great post


Yes, echoes of Rob's prize quotes about his books, among others!

Unfortunately, thanks to Amazon's algorithms and such, it is these sorts of criticisms that directly effect what books are seen and found by potential readers. Reviews should not be "I liked it because it was good." Or "I hated it because it was bad." Why? For the love of everything, tell us why!
One should be able to appreciate a work for what it is, even if it is not one's favorite.
As someone who, at some point or another, has read each of the books mentioned above (some for classes and some just for myself), I can safely say I did not "like" every one of them. In fact, many of them were a struggle just to get through and I had to force myself to keep going. What I can say now, however, is that I am glad I have read them, that each one has enriched my understanding of the world in some way. And any personal criticisms I chose to speak openly about I would make clear were my opinions and be sure to state my reasons for feeling as such.
I would never, never, NEVER say that a book should not exist!


I think this is by far my favorite understanding and explanation of the whole thing, why do we have to slander a book just because the reader didn't like it? At the very least say what was wrong with it in a very educated or at least helpful manner and get in with the day. To just go and hate it cuz you hate it is beyond me.


because as the person above stated, they are faceless on the internet and think that the word hate is appropriate for anything they don't like. I say plenty of stuff I don't truly think and kind of exaggerate at time but even then nothing that really condemns a lifestyle or a book/movie and any other opinion or object.
my way of reviewing is giving the credit it deserves, then going and stating (politely) what it is I don't like about it. but that the person go on and read it anyways because everyone has their own taste. never do I go about stating it is shit and the like and say for no one to read it lest you be stupid. never.
that being said, they're all idiots lol

Perhaps it's just part of today's culture in which everything is extreme. From politics to Animal Planet, it seems we are confronted with the biggest, the scariest, the fastest, the loudest, the farthest left, the farthest right, the most venomous, the stupidest, etc etc etc. So, two things happen: (1) With that as our standard level of discourse, nothing moderate can possibly be heard through the noise, and (2) we develop a habit of seeing things in extreme terms and lose all sense of nuance.
Or, y'know, they're just idiots ;)


I think part of the problem is just in the labeling. Instead of calling responses on Goodreads 'Reviews', we should call them 'opinions' or 'comments'. Many users I know are not trying to imply their responses are a definitive judgement on the book, just their own take and feelings. Obviously this is not the case for everyone, though.
I am still able to find quality reviews through publishing magazines, however, and even on librarian book blogs or library webpages. With the influx of information on the web, sometimes what seems lost is really only hidden.

I had a column in our high school paper called "Margi's Margin" (lol) and reveiwed books in the school library with verve & vigor. The librarian (a woman of stone) actually was actually nice to me.


No. Not ever. And if that makes me sound elitist, I don't care.

Sometimes I come up with an idea for an element in a story and realize that it's too close to reality, and thus beyond believable for readers and their criticism. Then I meet people in life with strangely ironic names and think God is the worst writer I know.


Please, someone save me from the unholy acronym and the abuses that have been piled upon it. If I hear one more person pronounce their acronyms as words, and there be a word that's actually spelled like the acronym sounds, I'll drown myself in the nearest body of water using books by Virginia Woolf as weights.

Fortunately, she produced very slim volumes. Now if you had said Thomas Mann I'd be worried.

Fortunately, she produced very slim volumes. Now if you had said Thomas Mann I'd be worried."
Yes, but I was going for that ironic twist to my death, and was rather hoping for something quicker than what killed Mann.

Don't know anything about his death. Didn't happen in Venice, did it? Not that I'm suggesting this would take the sting out. Still...

It's what happens when you devour too many books. The good news is, I'll save on postage!

I don't know about you, but suddenly I'm speechless.

I ..."
We've been ruining our perfectly good synopses with novels. Who knew?

I've always maintained that fiction must adhere to much higher standards than reality. Reality can just be a bunch of stuff that happens. Fiction has to make sense.

Lisa, I love this. Criticizing a horror novel for being too scary is like criticizing a romance novel for being too romantic.



This is kind of depressing, somehow.