date
newest »


As for katastematic pleasure, modern research makes this an evolving subject because scientists are researching ways to increase the normal heights for each person, which is why Gilbert's research on the science of happiness helps (he calls it synthetic happiness).
The connotation in our tradition is abiding in gratefulness (one can not profit from Epicurean teachings if one is ungrateful; for that, see my recent piece for The Autarkist on the pleasure-aversion faculty) and being self-sufficient in one's pleasure.
My book's editor (for "Tending the Epicurean Garden") made me coin an English-language term, which ended up making its way into the Urban Dictionary. I chose the term "abiding pleasure" as the English equivalent of katastematik hedone. The UD entry says:
abiding pleasure
The pleasure experienced independently of having achieved one's desires. English term for the katastematic pleasure of Epicurean philosophers.
Ex: What positive psychologists like Dan Gilbert call synthetic happiness, Epicureans call abiding pleasure.
Cheers,
Hiram
When I was a postdoctoral student with Albert Ellis, the founder of RET (Now REBT) he taught that the philosophies of the ancients, including Epicurus, Epictetus, and Marcus Aurelius, was the basis for psychological well-being. His favorite quote was from Epictetus "Men are disturbed not by things, but by the view which they take of them."
The author is obviously either a psychologist or philosopher in that camp. Our only criticism is that he could do a better job in explaining “Katastemic pleasure.”
Yours truly,
Gil Gaudia, Ph.D.