Lois’s answer to “I was just at Amazon to link a book recommendation, and I was saddened to see the new and very unap…” > Likes and Comments
4 likes · Like
Goodreads also has some weird algorithms about which of a variety of covers pops up first when you search for a book. Under the book listing there are pictures of all the editions - you can click on one and "switch to this edition" for your link.
The default edition of a book (the one that shows up when you search by title and/or author name) is simply the one shelved by the most users -- unless the author has manually set another edition to be the primary (default) edition.
I gotta agree about the bland covers - it's probably the Kindle covers:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=a9_sc_1?r...
Yeah, but until the OP answers, I'm not sure.
The Kindle covers are mostly for my direct-placement e-books, which are not Baen's. The person we had doing the covers, way back when we were first feeling our way into the very new e-market, had limited tools to work with. Now that we all know more, it might be time to upgrade the covers, but I really wonder if that's worthwhile, for e-editions. Does anybody buy an e-book for a cover? My impression was that it was all word-of-mouth and other recs. Thoughts?
Curious, Lois.
E-book covers don't make a lot of difference, but the quality generally speaks to the quality of the writing and editing in the book. When you see an ebook with a very low-budget cover, you expect typos. Word of mouth can make up for this, though.
In the sci-if fantasy genre you shouldn't judge a book by its cover anyway!! In general, if I buy an ebook it's because I already know I like the author or series...so ebook covers don't matter for me....I have a couple of the Vorkosigan books and never even noticed the covers (until this discussion)
I browse for new books by covers in Amazon and online stores. Maybe 1 in 6 of my buys happen that way.
If I'm looking for something new, I do notice the covers. As Elizabeth Parks said above, low-budget covers tend to signal low-budget production - which implies many things, none of them good. The implications may all be wrong, but by then it's too late...
I think it doesn't matter whether a book is paper or ebook - the cover is still the image the potential reader sees first, whether they're standing in a bricks-and-mortar shop or browsing through the "coming soon" pages of Amazon.
Once I know an author, I don't care what the cover is like, but for taking the plunge on a new author - it can be the thing that tips me one way or the other. (And I don't buy paper books any more.)
I'll be honest, I bought Memory twice,(3 Times counting dead tree edition) once with the pretty awful Kindle cover, and again from Baen, though that was partially to get it in drm-free format. The covers the REALLY need an overhaul are the omnibus. Sheesh.
I know this is a necropost, but I just spotted this one.
I don't care for the Passaway Pictures covers on the Kindle editions. I like the rest of them EXCEPT for the rare one by Darrel K. Sweet. I've never been fond of his artwork, except a few of his covers for the Xanth books, because his style complemented them.
I like some of the "covers" for the audio book editions. They're sometimes better than the ones on the paperbacks. I usually get the audio editions, with my eyes getting older, and I love Grover Gardner's readings (after he learned how to pronounce everything after Memory...I still grit my teeth on "Den-dar-ee-eye" and "Gal-EN-eye". But he got much better).
There are always new readers coming along and discovering new-to-them authors. And more and more readers prefer ebooks over paper. A professional, attractive cover is the first chance to catch the eyes of these readers. Covers are *always* important. IMO.
Just another example of word of mouth - that's how I was introduced to the Vorkosigan books. And at the liberary, cover isn't that big a deal.
I bought nearly all my Vorkosigan books through the SF Book Club, years ago. No choice on covers there, and I rarely pay much attention to them anyway. Unless they are really awful, like one of the McCaffrey books that showed the dragons with steering wheels! Good grief.
back to top
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kaje
(new)
Jun 12, 2015 11:13AM

reply
|
flag


http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=a9_sc_1?r...

The Kindle covers are mostly for my direct-placement e-books, which are not Baen's. The person we had doing the covers, way back when we were first feeling our way into the very new e-market, had limited tools to work with. Now that we all know more, it might be time to upgrade the covers, but I really wonder if that's worthwhile, for e-editions. Does anybody buy an e-book for a cover? My impression was that it was all word-of-mouth and other recs. Thoughts?
Curious, Lois.




I think it doesn't matter whether a book is paper or ebook - the cover is still the image the potential reader sees first, whether they're standing in a bricks-and-mortar shop or browsing through the "coming soon" pages of Amazon.
Once I know an author, I don't care what the cover is like, but for taking the plunge on a new author - it can be the thing that tips me one way or the other. (And I don't buy paper books any more.)


I don't care for the Passaway Pictures covers on the Kindle editions. I like the rest of them EXCEPT for the rare one by Darrel K. Sweet. I've never been fond of his artwork, except a few of his covers for the Xanth books, because his style complemented them.
I like some of the "covers" for the audio book editions. They're sometimes better than the ones on the paperbacks. I usually get the audio editions, with my eyes getting older, and I love Grover Gardner's readings (after he learned how to pronounce everything after Memory...I still grit my teeth on "Den-dar-ee-eye" and "Gal-EN-eye". But he got much better).


