Andrew Peacock
asked
Neil deGrasse Tyson:
Hey NDT! From the desk of a budding science communicator focused on astronomy, which three academic journals would you recommend following to stay on top of scientific discoveries? To add to this question, which three books have been instrumental for you as you’ve grown into a science communicator?
Neil deGrasse Tyson
There's a difference between what we normally think of as "scientific discoveries" and what appears in academic research journals. Academic research journals report the bleeding edge of research, much of which may ultimately be shown to be wrong. Actual discoveries are research that have been verified at least once, preferably multiple times by independent researchers. Also, such papers are often arcane, readable only by others who are fluent in the sub-field.
I strongly recommend a news digest, such as Science News. https://www.sciencenews.org or Scientific American. From there you can dig out the relevant links to research papers that fed their reporting. That's a vastly more efficient exercise.
I don't know of good books about science communication. But I've found a subscription to the Skeptical Inquirer https://skepticalinquirer.org of immense value to my background in addressing so many topics that matter to so many people, especially the pseudoscience traps that people fall into.
I strongly recommend a news digest, such as Science News. https://www.sciencenews.org or Scientific American. From there you can dig out the relevant links to research papers that fed their reporting. That's a vastly more efficient exercise.
I don't know of good books about science communication. But I've found a subscription to the Skeptical Inquirer https://skepticalinquirer.org of immense value to my background in addressing so many topics that matter to so many people, especially the pseudoscience traps that people fall into.
More Answered Questions
Sherry Funk
asked
Neil deGrasse Tyson:
Do you think you’ll ever run for president?(if you did, I would definitely vote for you)
José Carvalho
asked
Neil deGrasse Tyson:
Many breakthroughs in science were due to luck. After discovery of a new drug, comes a process of trial and error that consumes a lot of time and resources. If we had a quantum computer, the trial and error could be all simulated saving time and money? Instead of finding a new drug, maybe we can start designing new drugs due to quantum mechanics? Like turning on the light, see what we're doing and doing it better?
Kitora
asked
Neil deGrasse Tyson:
If you could pick any space-themed book to be required high school reading, which book would you choose?
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more