Johnathan
asked
Phyllis Edgerly Ring:
May I ask, were you able to make any historical deductions regarding Eva Braun? Regardless, it is a very intriguing idea altogether!
Phyllis Edgerly Ring
Thanks very much for this question, Johnathan.
Albert Speer said that historians would be disappointed in what they did, or did not, uncover about Eva Braun. As a writer, I had a different experience as I researched.
Some of the discoveries were more intangible and paradoxical, such as the fact that so much of what was conveyed about her was based on presumed understanding about Hitler, when in fact, more complete and accurate facts about her could help us better understand him. This made me wonder: how much of the truth do we miss because we approach finding it with ingrained, inherited -- often blindly imitative -- assumptions? In other words, how much do our biases trip us up before we even get started?
Another paradox, for me, was the recognition that those very qualities of compassion and caring that the Third Reich sought to suppress and demean were what Hitler came home to Eva Braun for. The massive hypocrisy in that got me wondering how this continuing imbalance, which misunderstands and devalues those "softer" human aspects even as it needs and depends on them, is still creating the kind of chaotic, power-pursuing conditions that engulf our world in so much violence and suffering.
A more concrete discovery was that testimony from an officer named Gottlob Berger at the 1948 Ministry Trials at Nuremberg indicates that an action Eva Braun took in the last week of her life saved tens of thousands of Allied prisoners of war. The record shows that she almost never interfered or intervened in anything Hitler did as leader, with very few small exceptions. I believe she did this out of the regard she had for life, some understanding of the moral principles behind the Geneva Convention --and, bizarre as it may seem to us today, to protect how Hitler would be perceived after the war. This suggests to me that, much like his secretaries and others in his inner circle, she lived a compartmentalized existence that, even that close to the end, knew far less about the Nazis' human-rights atrocities than has been supposed. A personal turning point for me was the discovery that some British members of my family were likely saved by this action of hers.
Albert Speer said that historians would be disappointed in what they did, or did not, uncover about Eva Braun. As a writer, I had a different experience as I researched.
Some of the discoveries were more intangible and paradoxical, such as the fact that so much of what was conveyed about her was based on presumed understanding about Hitler, when in fact, more complete and accurate facts about her could help us better understand him. This made me wonder: how much of the truth do we miss because we approach finding it with ingrained, inherited -- often blindly imitative -- assumptions? In other words, how much do our biases trip us up before we even get started?
Another paradox, for me, was the recognition that those very qualities of compassion and caring that the Third Reich sought to suppress and demean were what Hitler came home to Eva Braun for. The massive hypocrisy in that got me wondering how this continuing imbalance, which misunderstands and devalues those "softer" human aspects even as it needs and depends on them, is still creating the kind of chaotic, power-pursuing conditions that engulf our world in so much violence and suffering.
A more concrete discovery was that testimony from an officer named Gottlob Berger at the 1948 Ministry Trials at Nuremberg indicates that an action Eva Braun took in the last week of her life saved tens of thousands of Allied prisoners of war. The record shows that she almost never interfered or intervened in anything Hitler did as leader, with very few small exceptions. I believe she did this out of the regard she had for life, some understanding of the moral principles behind the Geneva Convention --and, bizarre as it may seem to us today, to protect how Hitler would be perceived after the war. This suggests to me that, much like his secretaries and others in his inner circle, she lived a compartmentalized existence that, even that close to the end, knew far less about the Nazis' human-rights atrocities than has been supposed. A personal turning point for me was the discovery that some British members of my family were likely saved by this action of hers.
More Answered Questions
Irene
asked
Phyllis Edgerly Ring:
I love your books, you are a marvelous writer! When are you going to write another fiction book?
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more
It is all quite intriguing, really.
I personally only became interested in Eva some short time ago. I reca ...more
Jan 07, 2017 10:13AM
Jan 07, 2017 10:38AM