Speaker Geeks! discussion

32 views
Law/Policy Debates > License for Owning a child

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by T.J. (new)

T.J. Heck no. It shouldn't even have to be explained because it's just so ludicrous. Kids aren't a car, they aren't a certain pet, they aren't a gun. So no.


message 2: by T.J. (new)

T.J. H99 wrote: "I agree with Shadowhunter Girl. There are some people who are horrible parents, but licenses... No."

It's a limit to freedom! A license needed in order to have your own kid that qualifies you as a parent? Are you kidding me? You need a license for foster care but who is the federal government to decide who is qualified as a good parent? The person may be in a dire situation but still wants to have kids; are they going to say she can't because she isn't allowed a license to the "appropriate spacing measurements for a child?" That is so...it's inhuman. As women we were given the right to bear children WITHOUT a little paper that says okay. They gonna have us tie it around the kid's neck, too? Dogtags are for PETS, NOT children!


message 3: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 2483 comments Kaylee wrote: "You have to have a license for driving a car, going hunting, and owning certain rare pets. Should you have to have a license to own a child? A parent is supposed to love, educate and care for there..."

like, no!!!


message 5: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 2483 comments about the having a liscense, obviously


Mrs.Crazy (nico di angelo) | 4116 comments Mod
Of course.


message 7: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 2483 comments XD


message 8: by Maddison (new)

Maddison (Brainyboots) | 463 comments no because many parents are doing a good job, this would not be fair on them


message 9: by Leah, I'm HI-larious! (Head Mod) (new)

Leah (lepolk) | 3478 comments Mod
Reviving


back to top