Twifanatics discussion

I think they need to CG Renesmee. It's impossible to have an understanding baby. They'll have to CG Kristen's eyes, too. What do you think they should do for all the supernatural beings?

Ooh that is a tuff one... and honestly I think they should try and do as much as they can with makeup and not rely completely on the computer....

They have to CG her, but I don't know how good the CG is going to be. I'd really like Renesmee to actually look like a baby who is partly like Bella, and partly like Edward. It's going to be really tough though.

Maybe (and hopefully) the technology will be advanced enough by then. What if they CGed someone's face onto a real baby? Yeah, I like it.

Autumn wrote: "Maybe (and hopefully) the technology will be advanced enough by then. What if they CGed someone's face onto a real baby? Yeah, I like it."

I was looking that up the other day. On Wizards of Waverly Place (I rarely watch it, but anyways), there was an episode involving Cupid. Cupid is a baby, and I think they CGed him because the baby opens its mouth and someone does a voice over and talks for the baby. I don't think the entire "figure" was CG work though, because everything about it looked like a baby; just the talking/moving mouth to form words wasn't. I have to say the talking part wasn't that great, but hopefully technology will improve in the next couple years, and they'll be able to do it. Also, Disney probably didn't use the best CG tech out there on a show like Wizards of Waverly Place.

Wow, I haven't seen that episode before. But I get what you're saying. They have to keep things a little more cheap with all the magic tricks they do.

With Nessie I think by then they will have better technology but at the same time I wonder if they should create the movie of Breaking Dawn.... It was a traumatic book....

Traumatic? I understand what you are saying, but I am not sure why it can't be made into a movie. The movie-making/film industry has made "Traumatic" movies in the past, so why not this one? I just want to know what your reasoning behind that is. I don't disagree with you, or anything.

Well that may be but I think it will lose quite a bit of their audience in order to achieve that traumatic effect.... that is what I don't want...

Lara wrote: "Well that may be but I think it will lose quite a bit of their audience in order to achieve that traumatic effect.... that is what I don't want..."

I see. So you are saying that this movie will be probably be given a higher rating, with all that traumatic stuff, and many people will not want to see it? I think that if they were fans of the book, and have read Breaking Dawn, then they won't have a problem watching the movie. The real problem is for those who haven't read the books and just watch the movies. Summit Entertainment will probably lose those people with Breaking Dawn.

I mean that they might have to rate it higher then PG-13 and if that happens I won't go see it...

Lara wrote: "I mean that they might have to rate it higher then PG-13 and if that happens I won't go see it..."
Even if it comes out two or more years later? I don't know. I'll probably see it because I know what happens anyways. The only stuff that would cause it to have a higher rating would be the honeymoon stuff, and then when Bella delivers the baby and nearly dies. I don't know if I'll see it in theaters though. If I get it on DVD, I can always fast-forward certain scenes.

I guess we will have to wait and see....

I will probably go see it with friends, no parents. I'll be old enough then. And the rating won't really matter for me. I will be a faithful fan and go to see it no matter what.

I'd see it but if you're under eighteen you can't see it in theaters without adult 'suprevision', right? And I wouldn't like to see anything at all uncomfortable with my parents. Doeso that make sense?

I tihnk Swann has two n's and maybe an 'e'. but i might be thinking of Elizabeth in POTC.

No, it is definitely "Swan." Feel free to check the book.

By the time Breaking Dawn comes out, I probably will be eighteen. I'll get carded and say you guys are with me. No parents!

Perfect! I was too lazy to check the book on the spelling, so thank you for assuring me that that was how it was spelled. I apoligize deeply for doubting you. Is it possible to italicize on here?

I have no idea. Ask Lavanya. And smilies too? I have no clue. Sorry, I went and quickly ate dinner.

Lavanya, can you italicize on here? You can make sideways smilies, but they won't turn on their heads. :)

I don't know how to get smilies on here. That's my problem.

Oh, I know - but my main problem is italics.

You guys are an odd bunch... :)

Lara, can you help us-ME! Please?

What? With what?

With smilies! I don't know how to get them on posts!

Okay.
Italics:
Just click on the "some html is ok" and it shows you how to do formatting.

(I am) Rosalie Hale. (I am) beautiful beyond measure -- the envy of every girl. (My) loyalty to (my) family is as fierce as (my) sense in fashion. (I) love (my) family very much, and wish (I) could have (my) own one day.
Actually, the first time I was Bella, through being dishonest, and the second time I accidentally said I was a guy and I ended up as Edward.

whoa. Freaky.

What specifically?

You being Rosalie.

That's not freaky at all! Although I lied on my description and said I was tall, statesque, blonde, because I wanted to be. I am so Rosalie, anyways.

No your are not! Unless you want to be her, then go ahead. But you aren't selfish or vain.

Actually...

Don't say it! You ARE NOT SELFISH OR VAIN! Otherwise you would truly care about what you wore.

Way to totally compliment me.

You're welcome! :)

I got Alice Cullen.

You're Alice Cullen, you're highly insightful, you love your friends, and most of all, you love looking on the bright side of things! You are intelligent, outgoing & stylish. Although you are a generous friend, you can be coy, tricky & very persuasive in order to get your way. You are known to zone out occasionally during conversations, but your friends forgive you because you are understanding, supportive & know how to throw one heck of a party! You are kind, sweet, thoughtful, and a bit old-fashioned. If you are looking for your true soul mate then you can be sure that when you find them you would make any sacrifice to ensure they remain safe. Maybe people would describe you as irresistibly charming and gorgeous. Lastly, you and your true love don't constantly need reassurance from each other that you are both being loved. Congrats!

I got Alice too... of course that is what everyone tells me.. although they say it is because I am short and annoying...

Ha! That would be me! Short. But I'm soooooooo Bella. Yay, I get Edward!

Alice had a much longer description than Rosalie. :( (Or Bella, or Edward.) But I'm totally happy as Rosalie. :)

*Slaps Clara infinite times*

You have no reason to slap me!

Clara wrote: "You have no reason to slap me! "

I absolutely do too! Why the heck would you want to be Rosalie? Unless you want to be with Emmett, no onw should want to be a vain and selfish Rosalie.

NO I GET EMMETT END OF STORY!!!!!

I'm 5'7" but I'm the shortest in my family so they say I'm short and annoying....

I'm just the saying that the only reason someone should want to be Rosalie is if they like Emmett. You get Emmett, that's been settled.

No, I like Rosalie's character and I want to be her.
Weird side effect of being named her though...last night I could not find Edward woodchippy in the slightest...I kept thinking about Emmett...I had to find a non-Twilight daydream...but I'm back to my normal Edward-loving self today!

What the heck do you like about Rosalie? Meanie, remember? If you don't change I'm going to shun you!

Change what? I explained about Rosalie's character on favorite female characters.

Yeah, and it wasn't right.