Better Than Starbucks discussion
Is it morally wrong to read the last couple of pages of a book before reading the rest?
date
newest »

i usually do it when i have read a few chapters, find the story interesting but the writing so poor that i am going to give up on the book. otherwise i love the not knowing until the end, in fact, if i did that to a book i liked i probably wouldnt finish it and would feel like i cheated myself out of a great tale. immoral? a sin? no, i would say its a personal choice, if it doesnt spoil the book for you, go for it!!!
Ruth, funny but I don't mind spoilers either. Somehow a spoilers don't have the same impact as the actual last few pages

I'm afraid in that situation I usually read some more from the final section of the book - sometimes the last couple of chapters

Argh.


Generally, I find books are best as books and in almost all cases I find to be better than movies, though I am such s picky reader that may not be fair. If I read NYT best sellers I might find general release cinema to be its equal. I do love a well read audio book! But then again, the wrong reader can destroy a book!!!!

Jessica wrote: "I don't generally read the last few pages -- they are going to be out of context and really not give me what I want: A Spark Notes version! So I almost always read the Wiki on a book before I eve..."
That is a really good idea Jessica, I will be wiki-ing books before reading them from now on :)
That is a really good idea Jessica, I will be wiki-ing books before reading them from now on :)
Anthony wrote: "Generally, I find books are best as books and in almost all cases I find to be better than movies, though I am such s picky reader that may not be fair. If I read NYT best sellers I might find gene..."
I usually find that if I read the book before watching the film - I'm disappointed by the film whereas if I watch the film before reading the book, I'm happy with both - the only exception to this rule being the Shining - for me the Stanley Kubrick film version is so much better than the book
I usually find that if I read the book before watching the film - I'm disappointed by the film whereas if I watch the film before reading the book, I'm happy with both - the only exception to this rule being the Shining - for me the Stanley Kubrick film version is so much better than the book
message 14:
by
Anthony, Administrator, Keeper of the Really Good Coffee
(last edited May 17, 2013 02:12AM)
(new)
lee agreed, but i find all of SK's books to be unreadable, but for the most part they make great movies... not sure how that happens
Anthony wrote: "lee agreed, but i find all of SK's books to be unreadable, but for the most part they make great movies... not sure how that happens"
I disliked the Shining so much that I haven't attempted anymore S Kings.
Graham Greene books make amazing films too - but then they are great books to start with.
I disliked the Shining so much that I haven't attempted anymore S Kings.
Graham Greene books make amazing films too - but then they are great books to start with.
Whenever I have mentioned this to anyone in the past, they have reacted with shock, outrage and sometimes even scorn and so I would like to ask you all - is this a sin and are there any other guilty parties out there?