Something Old, Something New discussion

I started reading this book as part of another group challenge and have hit a bit of a wall.
I'd love some extra incentive to try and get this mammoth book finally finished!

J wrote: "Basically, the end is worth it so you can get into Book 2, which is the real deal and more than worth your time. So go for it!"

I'm a bit over halfway of this now but am finding that it has slowed down an awful lot. I'm still keen to keep going though and get it finished.

Some discussion questions from Lit Lovers to get everyone thinking:

1. The book opens in the very near future, only several years from now. Is Cronin's portrait of 2018 believable? Does the state of society resemble anything that we might reasonably foresee occurring?

2. Does the military make the right choice in undertaking Noah? When so much of society is under constant threat of violence, is there a moral imperative to do whatever is scientifically possible to save the country from collapse?

3. Why does the military choose the name Project Noah? Talk about the irony behind the name—especially its Biblical reference to the destruction of a flawed race.

4. How far should society let science proceed in its research to alter biology? At what point do we say "no" to the human desire for ever greater knowledge?

5. Inmates on death row are offered a life sentence if they agree to participate in the government's experimental drug program. Is it moral to enroll murderers and rapists in medical research studies?

6. The Passage contains different types of writing, including diary entries, emails, maps, news articles, and academic papers. Why would the author use this technique to tell his story? How do faux documents contribute to the reading experience of the novel?

7. Discuss any or all of the characters in the first part of the book: Amy Bellefonte, Sister Lacey, Brad Wogast, and Carter, or any others. What are they like as individuals? Whom do you find most sympathetic?

8. Did you find it difficult to adjust to the end of Part I and the beginning of Part II? Did you enjoy the second part as much as the first? Some readers said it feels as if they are two separate novels. Others felt they blended well. What do you think?

9. Talk about the way in which the survivors of the colony understand the past—their own history and that of the world that has been lost.

10. What do you think of Peter Jaxson? Is he a satisfactory or disappointing hero? What about the other members of the colony?

11. What does the expression "all eyes" mean?

12. Amy wanders for years alone, and having no use for speech she loses the ability to talk. Can you imagine yourself in Amy's situation, unable to utter the most basic means of communication that all of us take for granted?

13. Members of the colony sometimes question the desire to continue in what appears to be a hopeless situation? What good is perseverance if it ends in futility? They also ask questions pertaining to God and destiny. What are your thoughts on these big issues? How would you answer those questions if you were a member of the colony?

14. Why does Cronin take readers inside the minds of the virals? Talk about the mental emotional processes they undergo—telepathy, memory or connections to one another. How are they like humans...and how do they differ?

15. What about the ending? Is it satisfying, with loose strings tied up? Or does it feel manipulative, purposely left open to make room for the sequel?

16. Will you read the second installment of the trilogy?

17. If you've read other vampire, horror, techno-thriller, or post-apocalyptic works, how does Cronin's compare? Do you see any any similarities? Consider Stephen King's works...or those of Michael Crichton, Cormac McCarthy, Susan Collins, Margaret Atwood, George R.R. Martin...and any others that come to mind.

I have to admit that I'm about 70% through now and it's finally started to pick up again and keep my interest. It's definitely hooked me in to know what happens to everyone but I still do feel that there has been an awful lot of 'filler' that could have been left out without damaging the story at all.
I've heard a lot of good things about The Twelve and will definitely be reading that after investing so much time in this first one.
I think you have hit the nail on the head as I have to keep stopping myself from comparing it to one of King's epic tales as it clearly is very different.

Oh boy! I finally finished this today and I have to say that I am totally exhausted!
I guess that's a good thing though because it means the book really engaged me and made me feel everything that was going on with the characters but I feel like I have just completed a marathon after reading this.
Talk about epic! And I'm so annoyed that we're left hanging on with so many unanswered questions at the end. That's going to kill me :-)
Overall I did enjoy this story but I still think there were a lot of parts that could have been condensed a bit without compromising the story in any way. If the author wanted his readers to feel like they were on a huge journey along with his characters then he certainly achieved this aim with me.
I'm not sure when I'll get to read the second one but I'm definitely keeping it on my TBR for when I do get the chance.

An interesting video where Justin Cronin talks about his book:

http://io9.com/5605835/justin-cronin-...

I read the first portion of this earlier this year and could not put it down. What followed totally lost me. I skimmed a section but had to abandon it.