THE WORLD WAR TWO GROUP discussion

This topic is about
The Gathering Storm
ARCHIVED READS
>
2014 - March - Theme Read - Atlantic Ocean Campaign


I hope to see a few other members join in this theme read and will be interested to see what books they bring with them.






" ... Redesign took time, though, and only in May and June of 1935 were the keels of battleships Gneisenau and Scharnhorst laid down at Deutsche Werft in Kiel and Kriegsmarine-Werft in Wilhelmshaven, respectively. Their 35-cm gun-turrets could not be completed in time and, to avoid delays, it was decided to mount three upgraded triple 28-cm turrets as a temporary solution. Both turret types had the same base diameter and neither draught nor stability of the ships would be adversely affected through a later upgrade. After the start of the war, there was never an opportunity to take the ships out of service for refit, and they were destined to spend their careers with 28-cm turrets - over-armoured and under-gunned."
I had not read that before (I'm more of a land based reader) so I found that quite interesting and I wonder if Germany had waited to fit the Gneisenau and the Scharnhorst with 35-cm gun-turrets what impact that would have had on their subsequent career/actions at sea?


currently half way though.. the Vaagso raid
once im finished this and my copy of the gathering storm arrives ill be joining the group read


"Questions were soon raised over the sea-keeping qualities of the new ships - the foredeck was too short and the poor lateral flare of the forward frames was an area of alarming weakness (AR's note - being a landlubber I have no idea what that means). In spite of extensive use of light alloy, the large superstructure and heavy armament gave the Zerstorer a top-weight issue. Even in moderate seas, the ships were unstable, reducing their combat efficiency significantly as they had to reduce speed to avoid structural damage in heavy seas. Of particular concern was the manhandling of 26-kg 12.7-cm shells and the separate cordite cases on a badly rolling deck. The bows of Z1 to Z4 were rebuilt during 1938, while modifications were made on Z5 to Z8 before launch. Further improvements, including a redesign of the foreship, were introduced for Z9 to Z16, but their basic design remained similar to that of the first ships and little was achieved to alleviate the problems of poor sea-keeping and instability."
Which reminds me, I'm sure I have a copy of this book which I was supposed to read about 20 years ago!


" ... Redesign took time, though, and only in May and June of 1935 were the ..."
AR: Gneisenau and the Scharnhorst are often referred to as battleships in Western histories, although battlecruiser is a more appropriate appellation due to the limitations of the 28 cm main batteries combined with their good top speeds. The USN would call those 11 inch guns and they would have placed Gneisenau and Scharnhorst at a serious disadvantage even against the old WW I U.S. Navy battlewagons of our Atlantic Fleet in 1941 such as USS IDAHO (BB-42) or USS NEW MEXICO (BB-40). They were armed with 14 inch guns which fired 1,400 pound (640 kg) armor-piercing shells 24,000 yards (22 km). In the days of naval gunnery, throw-weight of shell was the key predictor of success in battle at sea. During WW II our heavy cruisers, such as the USS BALTIMORE-class mounted 8 inch main batteries and our newer battleships, such as the USS SOUTH DAKOTA-class, boasted nine 16 inch main guns. Those 16 inch/45 guns could throw a 2,700 pound (1,200 kg) armor-piercing projectile approx 35,000 yards (32 km). If there had been a fleet engagement between the German navy and the U.S. Atlantic Fleet, Gneisenau and Scharnhorst may have run, but they couldn’t hide.




Cherbourg is pretty close!
found this one earlier in the year at a used bookstore.
it looks a little dated, 1984, but looked up the
author William Breuer, he has over 40 WW2 titles.



" .... The magic of radar, for example, was entering our lives, complete with teething troubles. Seamen - who had never been to sea - were trained to operate it. The buzz got around that crossing the beam with the instrument switched on would make them impotent. Came rough weather, less superstitious operators promptly put paid to their precious instruments by being sick into them. Emergency signals went forth both to refute the impotence scare and telling Medical Research to drop the pill they were working on to keep Wrens out of trouble and get cracking on one to stop radar operators being seasick. And so on. A different war with different problems, but the same old tussle with human imperfections."

So with "...telling Medical Research to drop the pill they were working on to keep Wrens out of trouble..." the Royal Navy was on the cutting edge of contraception development?

Seems so doesn't it!


It's very readable so far. One statistic that stood out to me: Out of the approximately 37,000 trained U-boat crewmembers in World War II, only about 6,000 survived the war to return safely to their homes in Germany.

That one is high on my want list but getting a HB is just soo expensive. May have to go for a Kindle (yuck!) edition.

try the paperback edition a lot cheaper..


I look forward to your thoughts on this one Geevee - I'm about 3/4ths of the way through - it been an interesting read so far.


You could pull an "AR" and buy it, put it on the shelf and read it later?


I confess. I am a book enabler.

Carl you were one of the first my friend! Too many David Kynaston and other 1950s & 1960s book recommendations.

"At times, smaller ships had to concentrate just on surviving; some of the British destroyers with captains reluctant to slow down in the face of the weather suffered structural damage. Impulsive was one, Kelly another, resulting in time in yard and cautions from the Admiralty. The rudders of Rodney and Nelson as well as cruisers Glasgow and Southampton were damaged, apparently from a weak design that rendered them incapable of withstanding the strain of continuous zigzagging in rough seas. Several ships suffered from leaks, especially the destroyers, and time spent in the yards increased."


"However challenging the Prize Regulations were, many U-boat captains made an effort to follow them and there are several examples of chivalry during the first months of the conflict. Kapitanleutnant Herbert Schultze of U48, having sunk the freighter Royal Sceptre, approached the nearby Browning, hailing the position of the Sceptre to its master, Hans-Wilhelm von Dresky of U33 notified the American freighter Washington of the position of the lifeboats from Olive Grove, which he had sunk 290 miles off Fastnet on 7 September. He even ran ahead to find the lifeboats and, when he did, he fired Verey lights to guide the American to them."

I knew Hans Goebbeler and his wife Riki, we did a few shows together in the 90s. Good man.

I knew Hans Goebeler and his wife Riki, we did a few shows together in the 90s. Good man.

That's cool, Colin! From the introductions and forewords, it sounds like the people he worked with at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry (where his u-boat is displayed) liked him a lot too.







Will do! I am not quite 1/4 of the way into it right now.
Books mentioned in this topic
Pocket Battleship Edward, Krancke, Theodor, Brennecke, Hans Joachim FitzGerald (other topics)If the Gods Are Good: The Epic Sacrifice of HMS Jervis Bay (other topics)
If the Gods Are Good: The Epic Sacrifice of HMS Jervis Bay (other topics)
The Arctic Convoys, 1941-1945 (other topics)
The Arctic Convoys, 1941-1945 (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Theodor Krancke (other topics)Gerald L. Duskin (other topics)
Gerald L. Duskin (other topics)
Richard Woodman (other topics)
Richard Woodman (other topics)
More...
This thread is open for members who wish to read and discuss any book or books covering the Atlantic Ocean Campaign of WW2, from 1939 to 1945, air or sea.