Sci-Fi, fantasy and speculative Indie Authors Review discussion
Suggestions
>
Bright ideas
date
newest »

message 1:
by
J.A.
(new)
Feb 18, 2014 10:36AM

reply
|
flag

I'll start - I've had a so so week writing wise as I've been working at other things - as my Defender's Series has started to end it's Select period with Amazon I'm getting books organised and ready to upload onto D2D for distribution to Apple etc - Book 1 in the series, has been uploaded and is available now on B & N, Apple shouldn't be too long tho I did get an email from D2D saying Kobo is running waaaay behind in it's uploads. I've also started working with my editor on one of my books so that's good - in my eyes - the guy is great and so easy to work with, he has good suggestions and we've now settled into a way of working in that any small changes i.e. if he finds spelling, or missed commas etc he goes ahead and does that without me having to say 'oh yea, sorry, missed that' or some such lol. I've also finalised cover for one of my new books - hummed and hawed about it but realised I really liked cover in the first book in that series so just changed it about a bit and hey presto I'm happy! Again guy I work with is great, let's be honest with my indecision sometimes he has to be lol! I've got some stuff on tomorrow but I'm planning on getting stuck into writing on Sunday - three quarters way through and know in my head what's going to be happening but just haven't typed it out yet. Jeez, that's quite a lot done and I didn't realise it! How's you week been? Ava

My week has not been as busy as your week! I am working on a redraft on my WIP.

Good idea. I'll add a 'Coffee Break' folder for chat about anything. We can have a progress discussion ongoing in there as well as a few other threads.
BTW I'm quite happy for people to start discussions in the relevant folders :)
BTW I'm quite happy for people to start discussions in the relevant folders :)


J.A.'s mention of our bar in the 'Who Are You?' thread made me realise: this may be the only Group anywhere in the Goodreads Empire with a bar, but it doesn't have a name. I was thinking maybe 'The Slushpile'?

In my youth I spent a lot of time in the slushpile, so going to a bar named Slushpile would probably be a trip down Memory Lane for me.
I have a slightly better than dim idea. How about a "want ad" section? Seeing as there are some multi talented folks and and some not as talented folks (maybe just me), could we have a section where those in need could post what they are looking for and what they are willing to pay or barter? For example, If I need someone to draw some wicked cover (which I may), I could post roughly what I want and what my price range is. Of course, if this already exists and I'm simply daft, could you point me in the right direction?

Am I allowed to second that idea...?
Oh... I'm already too late, aren't I?
Also, Christina (while I'm at it) feel free to message me(or I can give you my email, if that's easier) what you have in mind and price range, and I'll see if I can help! (If you'd like, of course...>_>)
One or two members of our Group will already know of, and perhaps even have participated in, another group called 'The Source'; and although that's now defunct, I think the idea itself was a good one and might be worth trying here on a smaller scale.
This is what's involved. An author posts their book; anyone else who feels like it can then screen it, i.e. judge its front cover, book blurb and a decent sample of text (for spelling, punctuation, grammar, formatting, general readability and so on) and either give it the thumbs up or a thumbs down. If it accumulates five Thumbs Ups it goes forward to be reviewed, five Thumbs Downs and it goes back to its author - who can later (having first raged at the unfairness of it all, tried to throw the laptop out of an upper storey window, hauled it back in again on the end of its cable, got blind drunk and woke up in a police cell next morning) rework the book and submit it for screening again. Books reaching the 'For Review' thread remain there until they've been reviewed five times.
It'll mean being brutally honest when criticising other Group Members' books. But, in return, the aim is to (a) eliminate all the amateurish front covers and inept book blurbs, all the typo-riddled and badly written prose which are giving indie books such a bad name; and (b) to get everybody who takes part five genuine, no-nonsense reviews posted on both Goodreads and Amazon.
So, what do you think?
This is what's involved. An author posts their book; anyone else who feels like it can then screen it, i.e. judge its front cover, book blurb and a decent sample of text (for spelling, punctuation, grammar, formatting, general readability and so on) and either give it the thumbs up or a thumbs down. If it accumulates five Thumbs Ups it goes forward to be reviewed, five Thumbs Downs and it goes back to its author - who can later (having first raged at the unfairness of it all, tried to throw the laptop out of an upper storey window, hauled it back in again on the end of its cable, got blind drunk and woke up in a police cell next morning) rework the book and submit it for screening again. Books reaching the 'For Review' thread remain there until they've been reviewed five times.
It'll mean being brutally honest when criticising other Group Members' books. But, in return, the aim is to (a) eliminate all the amateurish front covers and inept book blurbs, all the typo-riddled and badly written prose which are giving indie books such a bad name; and (b) to get everybody who takes part five genuine, no-nonsense reviews posted on both Goodreads and Amazon.
So, what do you think?


I like it. I will definitely participate in the reviewing and try to put my critic pants on. If nothing else, I'm good at spotting other people's typos. (And maybe someone will find mine since they are invisible to me.)
That's exactly the idea - working together, rather than competing, to produce some thoroughly professional-looking books.
It would all be done right here in this group - in a single folder, much like the BOTM folder, with separate threads for screening and reviewing.
It would all be done right here in this group - in a single folder, much like the BOTM folder, with separate threads for screening and reviewing.
I'm on board. Sounds like a great idea. I have a lot of critique experience so I can probably help there. My one stipulation would be no abusive language in a critique.
So saying ' this really isn't up to scratch yet because of x, y and z' is painful (probably) but useful.
But ' this is shit, I have nothing to say' is neither helpful nor necessary.
Totally ok with brutal honesty as long as it is for a purpose.
Bah what am I worried about? You lot are great ;)
So saying ' this really isn't up to scratch yet because of x, y and z' is painful (probably) but useful.
But ' this is shit, I have nothing to say' is neither helpful nor necessary.
Totally ok with brutal honesty as long as it is for a purpose.
Bah what am I worried about? You lot are great ;)


All I can say is that I'll try my damndest to participate in the screening process.



I think I'd better set up that folder then and Richard can do a thread on guidelines for this. Exciting stuff :)

I'm not a mod but I remember that the way the 'Source' worked was that authors would submit their titles (not the whole book at this stage, only one title and only the first in a series, or a standalone) for review of the cover, blurb, and the 'Look Inside' feature at Amazon Books.
After 5 positive reviews at that early stage, the author would have to make their books available for a review of the whole book. If there were 5 negative reviews at the early stage, then the 'whole book' review would be turned down.
I remember submitting my book but life got in the way for me and I just didn't get around to critiquing any of the books.
The concept was really kool. I'm looking forward to the guidelines and know it'll be quite a lot of fun :)
I've opened a new folder and a start up thread - which I'm hoping Richard will set out the guidelines for. If you have anything to add at this stage or suggestions to make, please now post them on the general discussion thread in that folder (The (smaller) Source) Thank you :)