twilight lovers! discussion

319 views
Eclipse Movie > Rachelle Lefevre ‘Stunned’ Over ‘Eclipse’ Recasting

Comments Showing 1-50 of 162 (162 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 3 4

message 1: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Summit Entertainment announced the replacement of “Twilight Saga” star Rachelle Lefevre in the series’ third film, “Eclipse,” on Tuesday night – and fans weren’t the only ones surprised by the news — Rachelle was shocked as well!

“I was stunned by Summit’s decision to recast the role of Victoria for ‘Eclipse,’” Rachelle said in a statement to Access Hollywood.

On Tuesday, Summit announced that Bryce Dallas Howard would be taking on the role in “Eclipse,” due in May 2010.

“I was fully committed to the ‘Twilight’ saga, and to the portrayal of Victoria,” Rachelle continued, explaining the turn of events that led to the casting change. “I turned down several other film opportunities and, in accordance with my contractual rights, accepted only roles that would involve very short shooting schedules. My commitment to ‘Barney’s Version’ is only ten days. Summit picked up my option for ‘Eclipse.’ Although the production schedule for ‘Eclipse’ is over three months long, Summit said they had a conflict during those ten days and would not accommodate me. Given the length of filming for ‘Eclipse,’ never did I fathom I would lose the role over a 10 day overlap. I was happy with my contract with Summit and was fully prepared to continue to honor it. Summit chose simply to recast the part.”

The star concluded her statement with a regretful tone.

“I am greatly saddened that I will not get to complete my portrayal of Victoria for the ‘Twilight’ audience. This is a story, a theatrical journey and a character that I truly love and about which I am very passionate. I will be forever grateful to the fan support and loyalty I’ve received since being cast for this role, and I am hurt deeply by Summit’s surprising decision to move on without me. I wish the cast and crew of ‘Eclipse’ only the very best,” she said.

Rachelle will appear in the series’ next film, “New Moon,” due Nov. 20.


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

insert outraged cussing here ---> @$#@#$@$@$%$$^^%@#@$#@$


>:O


message 3: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ how sad. why did they decide to do this?


message 4: by [deleted user] (new)

>:O They probably didn't want to lose a few pennies changing their filming schedule.

Hand me the scissors! Their Beaks are gone!

>:O


message 5: by ♥Jenny♥ (last edited Jul 29, 2009 06:01PM) (new)

♥Jenny♥ when did they get beaks? (just asking)


message 6: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
I'm really pissed about this!!!!!


message 7: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ same. and she seemed so nice and passionate about the whole series. thats really sad.


message 8: by [deleted user] (last edited Jul 29, 2009 06:06PM) (new)

♥Jenny♥ wrote: "when did they get beaks? (just asking)"



It's what Sharon said, in the Breaking News from Summit Entertainment thread.

Sharon wrote: "The better not,or i will cut off their beaks"


Beak cutting is Go!

>:O Grr face


message 9: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ im still confused about the whole beak cutting thing. can someone plz explain?


message 10: by [deleted user] (new)

It's a joke, we are pretending they have beaks, as if they are evil creatures with beaks.


message 11: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Huxford (blackpanthershay) | 737 comments Mod
Stephanie wrote: "Summit Entertainment announced the replacement of “Twilight Saga” star Rachelle Lefevre in the series’ third film, “Eclipse,” on Tuesday night – and fans weren’t the only ones surprised by the news..."

Summit is a very shady organization..I realized that months ago
How dare they? I believe what Rachelle is saying
They make me sick!!!


message 12: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Like VULTURES!!!!


message 13: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Or those things from The Dark Crystal!!!


message 14: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ like pigeons (they make ppl sick btw) just pooping all over the Twlight movies. grr


message 15: by Kemi (new)

Kemi | 71 comments it's sad for words!!!


message 16: by Sharon (last edited Jul 29, 2009 06:29PM) (new)

Sharon Huxford (blackpanthershay) | 737 comments Mod
♥Jenny♥ wrote: "im still confused about the whole beak cutting thing. can someone plz explain?"

Hi Jenny
Beak represents mouth.I was so upset with Summit I wanted them to shut up and if they didn't I would cut off their mouths lol
So in all my Caribbean craziness I used the word beak
and ranted in a dialect.."Tell Summit to shut dem mouth, shut dem breath, shut dem stinking beaks, or I go cut off dem blood***t beaks!!!!!!"



message 17: by [deleted user] (new)

Woo, go Sharon!


message 18: by Kemi (new)

Kemi | 71 comments o wow lol


message 19: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ Sharon wrote: "♥Jenny♥ wrote: "im still confused about the whole beak cutting thing. can someone plz explain?"

Hi Jenny
Beak represents mouth.I was so upset with Summit I wanted them to shut up and if they didn'..."


Woah, do u know what blood***** means? And thats what i thought u meant, but i didnt see why u would use it. Now i understand. Thankx for clearing everything up for me. I appreciate it. : D


message 20: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Huxford (blackpanthershay) | 737 comments Mod
♥Jenny♥ wrote: "Sharon wrote: "♥Jenny♥ wrote: "im still confused about the whole beak cutting thing. can someone plz explain?"

Hi Jenny
Beak represents mouth.I was so upset with Summit I wanted them to shut up an..."


Hey Jenny I am from the Caribbean I hope I know what blood***** means? lol
what does it mean to you?


message 21: by [deleted user] (new)

I couldn't find an e-mail for Summit, otherwise I would have started an online petition. All I have are these:

Address: 1630 Stewart ST, Santa Monica, CA 90404

Phone: (310) 828 4132

I can't really make a paper petition, so if anyone wants to say anything, I'd try there. They need to know how important having Rachelle is to the Saga.



message 22: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ gosh, well...good luck with that. maybe you can write a letter to them, put it up on goodreads and then get ppl to say that they like the story. thats the equivalent to a petition on goodreads.


message 23: by [deleted user] (new)

No, not a GoodReads petition. An online petition on a website deticated to petitions. But you can't do web petitions without someone to send them to. Like I said, I don't have Summit's email.


message 24: by ♥Jenny♥ (new)

♥Jenny♥ Oh, well that sux. they prob didnt put up their email address because they knew that something like this would happen.


message 25: by [deleted user] (new)

*Tsk tsk* and I thought since Summit was a relatively new company when Twilight came along, that they would be more careful.


message 26: by Katie (new)

Katie Stephanie wrote: "Summit Entertainment announced the replacement of “Twilight Saga” star Rachelle Lefevre in the series’ third film, “Eclipse,” on Tuesday night – and fans weren’t the only ones surprised by the news..."

I feel kinda bad for Rachelle. I think she did the part well.


message 27: by [deleted user] (new)

Me too.


message 28: by Kemi (new)

Kemi | 71 comments me too


message 29: by Kate (new)

Kate | 69 comments I think this is stupid. I actually liked the character because of her. I love at the end how she smiles evily as she comes down the stairs...it give me shivers every time! I think they are being very naive. It seems to me that she was doing her best to uphold her side of the contract. They could at least respect her and uphold their side. Stupid business jerks.


message 30: by [deleted user] (new)

Yes, I wish they would have kept her. They are already filming Eclipse.


message 31: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Yeah. When all is said and done she's out but I to wish they would have kept her. I mean what is going to happen if one of the other actors or actresses has scheduling problems for Breaking Dawn??


message 32: by [deleted user] (new)

I shudder to think. :\


message 33: by Katie (new)

Katie Missorli2 wrote: "I think this is stupid. I actually liked the character because of her. I love at the end how she smiles evily as she comes down the stairs...it give me shivers every time! I think they are being..."
I totally agree.




message 34: by Kim (new)

Kim Crowley (kimcrow) ive seen pics of the new victoria and she dont look right. Rachelle was great. had the whole 'im a wild vamp' thing going on.


message 35: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (last edited Sep 03, 2009 06:43PM) (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Kate Connor Pictures, Images and Photos




message 36: by Kim (new)

Kim Crowley (kimcrow) well at least she has the stunning pretty thing :L


message 37: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
She's alright but I still hate it when they switch actors or actresses in the middle of a series.


message 38: by Kim (last edited Sep 03, 2009 03:09PM) (new)

Kim Crowley (kimcrow) Stephanie wrote: "She's alright but I still hate it when they switch actors or actresses in the middle of a series. "

me too, its really frustrating. i was yelling at my computer when i found out bout the change. i also hate it when they make a film then a few years later another director remakes it. WHATS THE POINT!! i would prefer it if they thaught of new ideas and made NEW films.


message 39: by Kate (new)

Kate | 69 comments She doesn't look wild enough for Victoria


message 40: by Celia (new)

Celia Guzi (celiahearts) I think she looks more Otherworldly and wild than Rachelle. But whatever. What's done is done. I guess we'll see. Wait, we won't see. Victoria isn't even IN New Moon!


message 41: by Kim (new)

Kim Crowley (kimcrow) Missorli2 wrote: "She doesn't look wild enough for Victoria"

i agree


message 42: by Kim (new)

Kim Crowley (kimcrow) celia ♥ wrote: "I think she looks more Otherworldly and wild than Rachelle. But whatever. What's done is done. I guess we'll see. Wait, we won't see. Victoria isn't even IN New Moon! "

yeah i thaught that but whenever ive read articles about it
it says something like this:
rachelle from twilight AND new moon is being replaced...


its just darn confusing


message 43: by Celia (new)

Celia Guzi (celiahearts) hmmmm


message 44: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
I think that she is in it a little bit because doesn't Bella see her when she's in the water after she jumps off the cliff?


message 45: by [deleted user] (new)

Stephanie wrote: "I'm really pissed about this!!!!!"

Ya i thought Rachelle was perfect


message 46: by Celia (new)

Celia Guzi (celiahearts) i dont like rachelle


message 47: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
I don't really have an opinion about her either way. She plays such a small role in the first and second books but I do hate when they switch actors in the middle.


message 48: by Celia (new)

Celia Guzi (celiahearts) yah kinda convusing


message 49: by [deleted user] (new)

Ya besides what was wrong with her?


message 50: by [deleted user] (new)

Apparently she scheduled filming for something else, at the time she was supposed to be filming Eclipse.


« previous 1 3 4
back to top