VAMPIRES DON'T SPARKLE discussion
NEWS
>
Dracula Untold
message 1:
by
Angela
(new)
Aug 20, 2014 03:15PM

reply
|
flag
I'm actually not sure about this movie. Sure it looks like a cool action movie, but it seems to have almost nothing to do with the book by Bram Stoker or the legend of "Vlad the Impaler". And I don't like it when they portray him as the hero.
I get picky when it comes to Dracula. But...I'll probably go see it.
I get picky when it comes to Dracula. But...I'll probably go see it.



Angela wrote: "I too, am very much on the "picky" side concerning Dracula. However, all that I have found about this film is quite interesting. It is the story of Vlad Tepes, a prequel if you will, of how he beca..."
Like I said I will go see it, but it makes me go...."meh". I don't like Dracula being cast as the hero rather than the villain. He should be a murderous bastard. I liked the Coppola film, but whatever happened to the Dracula portrayals of Christopher Lee and Bela Lugosi who played him as evil. What ever happened to that???
Like I said I will go see it, but it makes me go...."meh". I don't like Dracula being cast as the hero rather than the villain. He should be a murderous bastard. I liked the Coppola film, but whatever happened to the Dracula portrayals of Christopher Lee and Bela Lugosi who played him as evil. What ever happened to that???
Angela wrote: "There is another new film about Vlad Tepes. It is produced by Brad Pitt titled "Vlad" the odd part, the production will not have vampires or Dracula. Strange as that sounds there is more. Summit (T..."
Oh yeah, the guy from "Sons of Anarchy" wrote the screenplay to that.
Oh yeah, the guy from "Sons of Anarchy" wrote the screenplay to that.
Angela wrote: "There is a lesser known Vlad film several years old now, starring the late Francesco Quinn as Vlad. The production was low budget but Francesco Quinn was hypnotic as the Prince of Wallachia. It is ..."
Are you serious??? No offense, but I hated that film and so did a lot of other people.
Are you serious??? No offense, but I hated that film and so did a lot of other people.

I love the classic Dracula portrayals. Bela Lugosi, Christopher Lee, and Frank Langella (My favorite). I have always seen Dracula as more a tragic hero rather than an anti-hero or villain. I would like to see a new film in the classic Dracula style.

Yes, from what I have found out about it, the film is to focus on history and Vlad the man without any myth to his story.

Yes, I am. I know this film has some problems however, it was a very ambitious film. The attempt was to balance history and horror. It was an independent film mostly financed by the cast of largely unknown actors,(without crowdfunding.) It was the first film of Director Michael D. Sellers, former CIA Agent. Still, the storyline was engrossing with several interesting plots. The cinematography of the dark forrest and Carpathian mountains was very good. I remember there was a character that only spoke authentic Middle English. There were parts of the film that were darkly beautiful. Then there was the amazing performance of Francesco Quinn which carried the film.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "There is a lesser known Vlad film several years old now, starring the late Francesco Quinn as Vlad. The production was low budget but Francesco Quinn was hypnotic as the ..."
Sorry I didn't like that film.
Sorry I didn't like that film.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "I too, am very much on the "picky" side concerning Dracula. However, all that I have found about this film is quite interesting. It is the story of Vlad Tepes, a prequel ..."
Stoker meant for Dracula to be the villain.
Stoker meant for Dracula to be the villain.

That's fine Dan, We can't all like the same thing, even if we do all like vampires. :)

Yes, I believe he did. But now there are many different interpretations of vampires since his time. I wonder what he would think about this?


I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, thank you!

Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "I too, am very much on the "picky" side concerning Dracula. However, all that I have found about this film is quite interesting. It is the stor..."
He would role over in his grave!!! Vampires were meant to be monsters, especially Dracula! It's all thanks to Twilight that we have the pussification of modern vampires. I'm pissed off.
He would role over in his grave!!! Vampires were meant to be monsters, especially Dracula! It's all thanks to Twilight that we have the pussification of modern vampires. I'm pissed off.
Angela wrote: "Do you like the Noseferatu style of vampire? Count Orlok is always the villain. Noseferatu A Symphony of Horror 1922 Max Schreck, Noseferatu The Vampyre 1979 Klaus Kinski, Shadow of the Vampire 20..."
Oh yes! I love all three of those movies. And a vampire never looked so creepy as did Max Shreck: the buck-toothed fangs, the bald head, the long fingernails, the pointy ears, the black clothes. That was awesome. And I did like Shadow of the Vampire, in which Max Shreck was a real vampire. Awesome.
Oh yes! I love all three of those movies. And a vampire never looked so creepy as did Max Shreck: the buck-toothed fangs, the bald head, the long fingernails, the pointy ears, the black clothes. That was awesome. And I did like Shadow of the Vampire, in which Max Shreck was a real vampire. Awesome.

There are still other books and films that cast the vampire as the villain, Stephen King's Salem's Lot and The Night Flier. Books that were films as well. The Night Flier is particularly creepy.

I like the Klaus Kinski Noseferatu the Vampyre film best. He was so rat-like and creepy.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "I too, am very much on the "picky" side concerning Dracula. However, all that I have found about this film is quite ..."
I'm a big Stephen King fan.
I'm a big Stephen King fan.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Do you like the Noseferatu style of vampire? Count Orlok is always the villain. Noseferatu A Symphony of Horror 1922 Max Schreck, Noseferatu The Vampyre 1979 Klaus Kinsk..."
I like it too, only I don't see him as "rat-like". I see him as his own original interpretation of the vampire.
I like it too, only I don't see him as "rat-like". I see him as his own original interpretation of the vampire.

My favorites of his books are The Dead Zone and Christine.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "I too, am very much on the "picky" side concerning Dracula. However, all that I have foun..."
I liked 'Salem's Lot, Pet Semetary, 11/22/63 and am currently reading The Stand.
I liked 'Salem's Lot, Pet Semetary, 11/22/63 and am currently reading The Stand.

Yes, that film is quite unique. The costumes were lovely. He was so creepy. There was something about how he positioned his hands and the fangs. Certainly, he was the vampire that one would not seek his touch.

Angela wrote: "The film Vamp features a unique vampire villainess, Katrina (Grace Jones). The film is not great but her performance is quite exotic."
Are you kidding, I love that film!!!
Are you kidding, I love that film!!!


Stephen King is a great writer. It's amazing the work he has done.


Nosferatu (1922) Probably one of the ones I wouldn't watch alone,maybe the only one I wouldn't watch alone. One creepy dude!


I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, thank you!"
"Dracula the Un-Dead" is 450 pages of pissing on the original classic. Virtually everything that happens in the original novel Dacre Stoker claims didn't happen. That hardly qualifies as an 'authorized' sequel.
On the other hand, while it's lousy Dracula, it's a decent and very fast-paced vampire story. But if you don't want to write about Dracula, don't put his name on your book.

Greetings Crystal, So true! The Noseferatus are the most creepy indeed.


I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, thank you!"
"Dracula the Un-Dead" is 450 pa..."
Greetings Perry, Thank you for the information. Certainly, the wording on the cover would suggest that Bram Stoker left behind notes to make a sequel. A little disappointing. However, I will still read it, I will just keep in mind that it is not a true sequel. I have read The lost Journal of Bram Stoker: The Dublin Years, also by Dacre Stoker It is quite interesting. :)
Angela wrote: "Perry wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Have you read
?"
I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, thank you!"
"Dracula the Un-D..."
Perry is right about Dracula The Un-Dead; as a stand alone vampire novel it's alright, but for the "Official Sequel" to Stoker's Dracula, it is a little disappointing. I contacted Dacre Stoker once on facebook and he said another Dracula book by he and Mr. Holt is in the works.
There is also another sequel by the same title
That book followed the original more and had a decent start-up, but the ending is disappointing.
I almost forgot there is a third sequel which came out in the early nineties I believe
Don't touch this one it's an absolute piece of shit!

I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, thank you!"
"Dracula the Un-D..."
Perry is right about Dracula The Un-Dead; as a stand alone vampire novel it's alright, but for the "Official Sequel" to Stoker's Dracula, it is a little disappointing. I contacted Dacre Stoker once on facebook and he said another Dracula book by he and Mr. Holt is in the works.
There is also another sequel by the same title

That book followed the original more and had a decent start-up, but the ending is disappointing.
I almost forgot there is a third sequel which came out in the early nineties I believe



I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, thank you!"
"D..." Thank you Dan, Both Dracula the Undead books look interesting I think I will read both of them. I have thought of contacting Dacre Stoker myself. I will keep an eye out concerning his new book. However, I read several reviews on the Mina book I daresay I think you are correct. :)

Dan, You may like "30 days of Night" the first film. The featured vampires are most certainly monsters.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "I too, am very much on the "picky" side concerning Dracula. However, all that I have found about this film is quite ..."
Yes, I do like 30 Days of Night. I have it on DVD and watch it all the time. I've also read the graphic novels.
Yes, I do like 30 Days of Night. I have it on DVD and watch it all the time. I've also read the graphic novels.
Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Angela wrote: "Perry wrote: "Angela wrote: "Dan wrote: "Have you read
?"
I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, tha..."
Don't bother with it, the Mina book I mean. The author turns Mina Harker into a whore, and Dracula isn't even in it!

I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly read this, tha..."
Don't bother with it, the Mina book I mean. The author turns Mina Harker into a whore, and Dracula isn't even in it!

Although, I like my vampires more princely than monster I like this film. I also have the DVD.


I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly..."
Yes, I will read the other books, however I will pass on the Mina book. After reading several reviews of it I know that I would not like it.


I have not but it looks quite wonderful! I will certainly..."
Wow, That will never do! Indeed I will pass on that.


I have seen Dracula Untold and it is amazing!!!It's a fast paced action adventure film about Vlad who has to make a dark choice to save his family and his kingdom. Yeah this Vlad (played by the brilliant Luke Evans) is a hero, so in this respect you have to forget everything you know about Dracula because this is set 400 years before Bram Stoker wrote this book. It's an origin story that is both historical and takes a turn into fantasy. This story is both epic and tragic at the same time. It also takes vampires back to the beginning I reckon, no sparkling skin which I'm sure all the true Dracula fans will enjoy.
It's not modern that's for sure since it is set in 1462.. where Vlad is fighting off the Ottoman invasion.
It's an amazing in site to the famous man behind the famous monster. I couldn't imagine anyone but Luke Evans to play this role, he has the menacing look, the determination that Vlad has and the softness when it comes to the love of his life and his son.
The only downside I think is that it is too fast paced and is only an hour and a half long :(
I would highly recommend this film to anyone and everyone. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD and maybe a sequel given the way it ends :)
Rhoni wrote: "Elke wrote: "Anyone who watched Dracula Untold yet? It currently shows at theaters here, but I'm a bit busy currently and not sure whether it's worth to spend time on it. I have an uneasy feeling i..."
Sounds cool! I thought it doesn't come out till tomorrow though?
Sounds cool! I thought it doesn't come out till tomorrow though?


Also, if the trailers are true, Vlad as a vampire has powers that Count Dracula never dreamed of. He'd have to lose these powers to become Stoker's character.
It's not something I'd care to watch.
Books mentioned in this topic
Dracula Arisen (other topics)Vampire Wars (other topics)
Brides of Dracula (other topics)
Dracula the Un-Dead (other topics)
Dracula the Un-Dead (other topics)
More...