The Institute
discussion
Thoughts on The Institute
date
newest »



I think this was especially true of The Institute, there were more characters than in The Outsider and most of them weren't really fleshed out. At one point I started confusing two kids with each other because there really wasn't much setting them apart. It's not like this is a regular problem with King, the kids in It all have distinct voices and personalities.

Escape from the institute felt more like an inventory of objects than dangerous event.
It seems to me that at least two people wrote this book and the one who wrote about Institute forgot the question.
Waste of time



I definitely didn't feel it was a waste of time, or badly written, just different. He is a very eclectic writer, so with the exception of his "drunk fiction" I don't think that should be surprising to a Constant Reader.

My main complaint is that there are about 6,000 unnecessary pop culture references in the book and the ending sucks. But overall I liked the story and it was a fun read, sort of as a thriller with macabre elements.

I agree, and I'm starting to feel like he's recycling material. This read very similarly to Firestarter.


I was also a huge fan of the easter egg politics that King left with references to anti-vaxxers and the 2016/2020 U.S. presidential election.


all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
The Outsider (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
The Institute (other topics)The Outsider (other topics)
What did you think of King's most recent release The Institute? I think it compares best with his previous novel The Outsider in that much of the first half of the book felt unnecessary. There were cultural and political references in both that add some depth, but I felt neither book explored the characters as fully as his really great books do.