The Seasonal Reading Challenge discussion
WINTER CHALLENGE 2019
>
Group Reads Discussion - A Discovery of Witches
date
newest »



Good Luck Jessica-I threw it back, not going to read it. Points are not a big thing to me, so makes no difference to me if I do the Group Read. I just am not reading books I am not invested in anymore-it feels great!



LoL-I can understand the OCD and pride...been there. After my 3rd Season here, I just made up my mind not to finish anything that was dragging me down-I think this is my 6th season now, and I always shoot for 300 points too-if I get more I am thrilled
Dlmrose
Really? almost 600 pages and that's the resolution?! This was way too long, too little happened, with really uneven pacing, There would have to be a really good reason to pick up #2, as this one didn't do much for me.
Really? almost 600 pages and that's the resolution?! This was way too long, too little happened, with really uneven pacing, There would have to be a really good reason to pick up #2, as this one didn't do much for me.
I had read all 3 of the choices, but the other two much more recently, so I picked up this one again.
I think I disliked it much less than the other commenters here. It was undemanding, reasonably interesting, and didn't need to be read all at once - I kept the audiobook in my car and listened to it there (which is why it took forever to read it!).
I'm not a romance reader, so I did quite a lot of eye rolling! I'm always taken by the "falling into undying love" in about 5 minutes.
One thing I found interesting was the genetic stuff - the idea that genetic analysis would indicate all the witch abilities and such. I think that's an interesting extension of the current interest in getting one's DNA analyzed - hey, maybe I should do that and find out that I have witch abilities!
I think I disliked it much less than the other commenters here. It was undemanding, reasonably interesting, and didn't need to be read all at once - I kept the audiobook in my car and listened to it there (which is why it took forever to read it!).
I'm not a romance reader, so I did quite a lot of eye rolling! I'm always taken by the "falling into undying love" in about 5 minutes.
One thing I found interesting was the genetic stuff - the idea that genetic analysis would indicate all the witch abilities and such. I think that's an interesting extension of the current interest in getting one's DNA analyzed - hey, maybe I should do that and find out that I have witch abilities!


The story started really slowly and I felt the connection between Matthew and Diana was too sudden. One moment she was somewhat standoffish and the next they were in love. I totally missed something.
This book was definitely not what I was expecting it to be. I thought it was a fantasy when in fact it feels more like a romance with more built up around it.
I'm not sure I'm interested enough to read the rest of the trilogy.

I actually really liked this book, although I can agree with everyone who thought it was too long and slow. It was a new take on witches and vampires, and I loved the setting, both Oxford, France and US. I have the next two books waiting for me, and I'm looking forward to find out their further adventures.

(side note: It's hard to say what I don't like about this book. I mean, it is interesting... maybe I don't like the whole pretentious Oxford thing, all the detail, or I don't know... I can see why some people would really like it, I'm just not super into it... HOWEVER, Matthew just left Diana with his mean, old-lady vampire mom. I like her. Maybe she will save the book for me.)


I did however really like the scenes in Diana's aunts house (witchy aunts are a favourite trope of mine), particularly the house itself being a distinct character with its own powers.
I might well read the sequel but NOT within the confines of a reading challenge if it will take me as long as this one did!

I prefer Sci-Fi to Fantasy. But I still might try to find it once it comes out on DVD.
In reading the book, I like the fact that the demons and vampires were all just a little bit "off." But generally speaking, I like my vampires of the 19th century variety -- Carmilla and Dracula and their all too different sexual neuroses. And demons? Well, like I say I like Sci-Fi better than Fantasy. But I still might try to find DOW once it comes out on DVD.
So there must be something about it I liked. Right?
I liked the Oxford intellectual stuff. I liked the genetic near-to-sci-fi element. I thought those things lifted it above the tawdry romance it actually was.
Why then do I feel so 'blah" after reading. in snatches over a couple of months, this tome? Maybe it did not lift enough above the tawdry romance. And some of the almost-gothic fantasy was cartoonish. To me, Dracula and cartoons do not mix, and should not be attempted.
Nonetheless, once the TV series comes out on DVD, I will probably try it out.


I've actually read this before, when it first came out - but I had no memory of the plot, so I decided to have another go with it. And I promptly remembered why I forgot.
Maybe it's just that I've read SO MUCH urban fantasy with a damaged, broody vampire romantic interest, but I'm tired of it. And I wasn't a huge fan of the female main character either. The historical bits were potentially interesting, but they got bogged down. I'm a compulsive series completionist, and I have zero interest in finishing the series any time soon.
The requirement for task 20.10: You must participate in the book's discussion thread below with at least one post about the contents of the book or your reaction to the book after you have read the book.