Creative Reviews discussion
Author Resources
>
Dealing with harsh criticism
date
newest »


Good article. I think it was in Stephen King's On Writing that I saw the advice about critiques and it's great advice. Find ten people to beta read your manuscript. If more than three people have the same negative comment, work needs to be done. If it's just one, that's a personal preference.

Exactly. Criticism is a big problem with any art. As you said, if it is just one person it is not important. If the same complains pile up, the artist should reconsider the issue.

2-3 times a week— per class, so several times a day— we would let a roomful of our peers, plus a professor, zoom mercilessly in on any and every aspect of our work, zero holds barred, nowhere to hide. We didn't mind because the critique— while micro-targeted, unequivocal, and often ruthless—came from people who shared a vocabulary. Literally.
Not so with amateur criticism. Writers and other people are expected to take criticism, sure. And they're judged as a bunch of thin-skinned egotists if they take issue with anything said. But the truth is: amateur "harsh criticism" is sometimes *not* strong medicine, a sobering look in the mirror, a pointed word to a naked Emperor... sometimes it's just pompous snark, served up hot n' fresh by someone who's in the catbird seat and knows it. Why, if you dare to complain... you "just can't take criticism!"
There is nothing in the world that says you have to accept it if people use vague, rude terms or get uncomfortably personal. The critic should be educated enough to express him/herself in language that shows s/he is offering helpful suggestions on the matter of craft, not tearing a fellow human being new orifices to bleed and cry from.
https://mybookwhisperer.org/2020/03/3...