Praise Architecture discussion

This topic is about
Towards a New Architecture
Towards a New Architecture
>
Three Reminders to Architects: i. Mass, ii. Surface, iii. Plan
date
newest »


Having lived in Corbusier's Chandigarh for a couple years, my experience of his planning has been a mixed bag. The roads work great but the capitol doesn't. In his own work, he was more forgiving to pedestrian plazas and recreation zones than the word "fungus" would allow us to believe, but his plazas still remind me more of soulless concrete than 'garden city'. To be fair to him, he took over an initial master plan laid out by Albert Mayer and did not start from scratch, but Chandigarh is a good place to see his ideas from this essay in action. With mixed results.
I am however very glad that his urban plan for ‘a city of towers’ remained just a hypothetical one. This book was originally published in 1923 and most of the essays were published in Corbusier’s magazine L’Esprit Nouveau before this in 1921. Corbusier clearly loved this idea of a city of towers and was very concerned with overcrowding in Paris, which is what lead him to developing his urban plan for Paris, ‘Plan Voisin.’ I almost felt personally offended when I read the quote: ‘cafes and places for recreation would no longer be that fungus which eats up the pavements of Paris’. Over-spilling cafes and street activity is seen as a tourist attraction in itself now! It’s something we find charming and gives character and a sense-of-place. I think Corbusier had good intentions with his brutal city plans but I’d rather read about them and look at the drawings that experience them in real life.
- Praise Architecture