SA Book & Challenge Lovers discussion

This topic is about
A Study in Scarlet
Book Pool 2022
>
A Study In Scarlet - Arthur Conan Doyle (Spoiler)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Wayne
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jan 01, 2022 04:46AM

reply
|
flag

As a life-long reader of mysteries I should have read Sherlock Holmes by now, but somehow never managed it. I enjoyed the introduction to the characters and the writing is easy.

I was commenting earlier in the Reading the Detectives Group on the influence of technology on the mystery genre. In the old books, a lot of it is painstakingly following the clues and slogging on. The difference here for me is that Holmes has done some of the work earlier in his research and experiments. He can then find answers and make statements based on the prior information rather than doing the work during the investigation. Since the reader doesn't have the information, it then requires a big leap of faith by the reader.
I'm reading The Three Taps: A Detective Story Without a Moral and he has a paragraph where he introduces the detective as follows: He carried neither lens nor a forceps, not even a revolver; he had no stupid confidential friend, but a private detective he was for all that."
A fairly obvious dig at Holmes and Watson!
A fairly obvious dig at Holmes and Watson!
I'm not ecstatic about the two stories in my copy.
A Study in Scarlet ends with an arrest, but absolutely no discussion of motive. I know it's a classic, but it feels under developed. There's no bridge to the second part.
The second story is the romance/adventure set in Utah and I am underwhelmed to put it mildly. I'm gritting my teeth to complete the book. I have now figured out the second one being the backstory to the first, but it is so horribly overdramatic, that I am not finding it fun at all.
A Study in Scarlet ends with an arrest, but absolutely no discussion of motive. I know it's a classic, but it feels under developed. There's no bridge to the second part.
The second story is the romance/adventure set in Utah and I am underwhelmed to put it mildly. I'm gritting my teeth to complete the book. I have now figured out the second one being the backstory to the first, but it is so horribly overdramatic, that I am not finding it fun at all.

I quite enjoyed it, it was easier reading than I thought it would be. I was initially confused with the dramatic setting change in Utah, thinking my ebook had been mixed up with another book.
I agree with Carolien that it is overdramatic and rather a stretch to believe that Holmes could've tied it altogether so neatly.

What did you think of Holmes' research methods, especially the rough handling of cadavers?
Diane wrote: "I tagged onto this rather last minute when I saw you discussing this book. So I immediately got a copy off Project Gutenberg.
I quite enjoyed it, it was easier reading than I thought it would be. ..."
I had the same reaction - thought it was two separate stories in one book.
I quite enjoyed it, it was easier reading than I thought it would be. ..."
I had the same reaction - thought it was two separate stories in one book.

What did you think of Holmes' research methods, especially the rough handling of cadavers?"
It was bit grim. I wonder how he procured his cadavers?

What did you think of Holmes' research methods, especially the rough handling of cadavers?"
I..."
Well, I guess working in the hospital laboratory helped a fair bit.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Three Taps: A Detective Story Without a Moral (other topics)A Study in Scarlet (other topics)