2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

This topic is about
Breaking Point
Breaking Point (SB)
>
Question K
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Sep 30, 2022 06:22PM

reply
|
flag

That said, nothing else worked. Some of the many plot holes:
1) Why bother telling Molly and Gina that his "wife" was killed?
2) Why decide to release them?
3) Why agree to go with Jules?
4) What happened to crowbar guy, the woman and the child?
5) What was the purpose of the clueless commander?
Don't even get me started on the totally nonsensical faking of Jones' death and killing of the sadistic colonel.
Moreover, portraying the Indonesian people as either vicious killers, corrupt politicians, stupid underlings or helpless victims just reeks of paternalism.
As you can tell, I have serious issues with the plot of this book!

I didn't take away from the story the same things as Lauren. I didn't take it as a negative comment on the Indonesian people. This book was written in 2006 when there was high crime, corruption, and drug trafficking in Indonesia.
I looked at Nunsantra as a gang leader who controlled his part of the world. It is the same as the Aryan Brotherhood, Hell's Angels, Latin Kings, or one of the many other gangs running roughshod over neighborhoods in the US. It doesn't mean everyone in the country is corrupt, just those who can be intimidated by the gangs.

Emilio was a seasoned kidnapper. It’s what he was known for. He told Gina and Molly that story about his wife to gain their trust. Molly bought it; Gina remained wary. Crowbar guy took off with Emilio’s wife and child when it became clear that Grady was outside. He led Jules away to not only kill him but prevent him from calling in reinforcements. It was all about the money for Emilio who was apparently hated by those in that town.
It was hard to keep up as the motivation and forces were a bit convoluted. I had to go back and piece it together. This wasn’t Brockmann’s finest but in the end I made some sense of it.
It was hard to keep up as the motivation and forces were a bit convoluted. I had to go back and piece it together. This wasn’t Brockmann’s finest but in the end I made some sense of it.

That said, this requires the reader to fill in a lot of information that is not made sufficiently clear in the book itself.
Also, why did Emilio then try to kill Jules after the car crash? He had already stopped him from getting reinforcements.
Lauren, I agree this required too much work. I had to go back and sift through lots of dialogue to piece this together.
Jules figured out it was always Emilio’s plan to kill him. That’s why he crashed the car.
Jules figured out it was always Emilio’s plan to kill him. That’s why he crashed the car.


It was impossible on audio. That’s why it took me so long to create the discussion questions. I literally had to pour through details.

When I’m listening, I’m doing something mindless like washing dishes or dusting. I also listen while taking a bath. I’m rarely distracted from my audiobook and when I find I am, I pause. But this book? It was a challenge.