A site called Mystery Tribune published this several weeks ago, and I found it when I was googling something else. It's really the kind article that puts me off - it's like the curator - I can't even really say "writer" - went to Amazon, typed in "Sherlock Holmes" and cut and pasted 106, adapted the book's synopsis and then compiled it into an article. I did post a comment. One other comment said that a "Sherlock Holmes novel" was not the same as a "Sherlock inspired novel" which I thought was a good point. Here is a link
https://mysterytribune.com/106-best-s...