Franny and Zooey
discussion
A lecture on this book
date
newest »





This was the book where I discovered that where I presumably identified with one character when I was in my teens, when I read it in my fifties I saw it more from the mother's viewpoint.
Age! What a bummer!

For some reason, the novel seems to have confused and bemused many, if not most, of its American readers.
A good feature of this lecture is the way the professor emphasises the positive elements in the religious / mystical vision Salinger dramatises in FRANNY AND ZOOEY. This vision is deeply negative, as Salinger implicates it in Seymour's suicide, but the Yale lecturer has convincingly demonstrated that it has powerfully life-affirming elements as well.
The lecture is well worth viewing, thank you for posting it.


This was the book where I discovered that where I presumably identified with one characte..."
I read this book again this past summer at the age of 57 and I couldn't have loved a book more. I believe it is his masterpiece and actually quite timely given the state of religion and belief systems prevalent in our world today.


Couldn't agree more. Love the analogy of the "fat lady". Worth every word, and then some. Much to learn from this book even if you think you are too old. Poppycock.
...Zooey tells Franny that one time when Zooey was on "It's a Wise Child," Seymour told him to shine his shoes. Since it was a radio show and the studio audiences were stupid, Zooey did not want to. But, Seymour told him to do it for the "Fat Lady."


I watched about three minutes of the lecture this morning before my nine week old puppy demanded my full attention. I plan on watching it all soon as I am able to.



I could not agree more. Perhaps aging and having more life experiences helps to understand and appreciate this book. There is also the possibility that some younger persons are already older souls.


I'll take it that I have a bit of the old soul in me then because when I read this book at seventeen I was totally plunged into the story. I felt so at home with the workings of JD Salingers mind. Though there were times when I had to grope for things between the lines, but still it was like I knew in my heart what he was talking about. I've reread it so many times in the last two decades but my appreciation of the book has not diminished one bit.

It is a dandy.


If nothing else, Salinger is a master of conversation, both between characters and a character with his/her own mind.
I have to give Seymour: An Introduction another try. Every time I reread a Salinger story (other than Catcher, ironically enough) I seem to warm up to it a bit more.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toql5j...