Science Fiction Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Hyperion
Monthly Group Books
>
Hyperion
date
newest »



The second book is certainly required reading if you want to know more answers, i'm not sure if it is possible to work it out for yourself from just the first book :)
I am actually partially through the second book, and as Zac alludes to, it is different, but I haven't made my mind up if it matches the 1st yet.

In that case I'll read the second. Glad for the warning it is different. Wish I'd know it was a series when I read this one - I wouldn't have been so critical or disappointed!
Thanks.
PS just did a search on Amazon and I'm not sure now I missed it.



hahahah LOL Are you making fun of me?



Anyone finished this series yet?

I concur with Jon; Hyperion is book one of a series that is meant to read in its entirety or you will find there are pieces missing and the story doesn't come together.

Agree again. I loved Ilium and Olympos almost as much at Hyperion :)

But in all that darkness you can see the best love story I´ve ever read. The warrior (don´t remember the name) and his lover travelling back in time. Unforgetable!
I had no idea what was going on at the beginning because of the heavy use of terminology. That's not a criticism, just an observation. I am not put off by terminology as I just assume it will all become clearer later on. (However, it took me to about half way through the book before I could read the terms Web and World Web as a collection of connected planets. I knew what it meant - but my brain refused to link the word to anything but the www.)
Then I thought: Oh no, I'm going to have to read dull background on each person before getting to the story. Turned out the whole book was really a set of short stories with a common theme, and the stories were really good.
At the end, I was still thinking: so why were the going/sent to Hyperion?, who is the Shrike?, who killed that guy and why? what was his story? why was Hyperion important? who built the labyrinths and Time Tombs and why?
Thinking about it a few weeks after finishing, I realised that most of the answers were probably there, but the point is you have to work it out for yourself. Or is the point that sometimes there are no anwsers?
Usually I get bit annoyed with authors who spell things out - "yes, of course that is what is going on, get on with it", but in this case I would have liked a helping hand at the end.
I wish I'd known what I was really going to be reading when I started. If I had known it was going to be down to me to work it out, I would have read it more carefully. And I wouldn't have had expectations for the end, and so wouldn't have been disappointed when it didn't come together. This book is a puzzle not an epic adventure.
Enjoyed reading, thought the stories were all good, but overall it was all build up with no conclusion.
What did everyone else think?