Silence
discussion
Do you think Nora losing her memory was needed?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kira
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Dec 28, 2011 01:17PM

reply
|
flag
Suspense? I liked it because I fell in love with Patch... again :D

Eh. It was sort of unnessacary for me because to me, it was pretty much repeating their relationship. I do like that books, but I could have done with out it. I think Becca Fitzpatrick did this because she probably wanted more suspense and I think she was trying to lengthen out the book. It would have been interesting if she had done something else for the third book.





I know!



I know! The characters came more and more developed it seemed like!

If it isn't a big part of finale I don't know what to say. That kind of thing can alter and shape you life. I hope it isn't glossed over and trivialized.
message 17:
by
Cassie 'The Thinker Go Go Go Go' Mis. Roben Goodfellow'\Isabelle Lightwood
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars

I hated this book. The author just did it to make the series longer. Since Norah lost her memory, what could have happened is the third book is going to happen in the forth. Its dumb.
I don't know if it was necessary or not, being that I'm not the author of these novels, but I didn't really mind that she lost her memory. It showed us that they would always choose each other, no matter the obstacles and I liked how they fell in love all over again. SO SWEET! LOVE CONQUERS ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Gina said:Suspense? I liked it because I fell in love with Patch... again :D
I agree, its like the first book again, but Patch is more mysterious and their falling in love is more intense...
I agree, its like the first book again, but Patch is more mysterious and their falling in love is more intense...




all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic