The Sword and Laser discussion
What Else Are You Reading?
>
Books where evil wins?



Well of Darkness also starts off following someone who falls down the evil path, and is a better written story.


Too bad that book is horrible.

But that is still a story of a nobody turning into a mighty person. Granted, it is on the evil side. I might try it, I've read a few SW books.

If your reply was to me, I don't consider it a spoiler. As for 99% of the rest of the fantasy books I read, I know good will prevail, so that would be an equal spoiler.

Black Sun Rising
Crown of Shadows
When True Night Falls
I think here you'll find several nice shades of grey rather than the very black and white/good and evil stuff.

I was pretty sure he was just asking for the evil perspective not for a powerful person growing weak. That happens in the first books of many series, like The Lies of Locke Lamora

For me, if the bad guy wins, it ruins the book.



True, and a good book too. I found it a disconcerting read as well, so I'm glad to hear that I am not alone there. However, it is the first in a triology where ultimately good triumphs.


It's okay. We won!!!! MUUUHHHAAAAAAAAA!!!!! MUUUUHHHHAAAAA!!!!



The Amazon description is a good summary:
"This novel is set in a 20th-century Britain where the Reformation failed and the country is still being spiritually ruled from Rome. A world where magic works. The central character is a priest who is also drug-smuggler, rapist, necromancer, murderer and black magician."
The story follows the main character's life from childhood to his eventual end. The descriptions aren't graphic - it's bleak and unsettling, rather than glamorizing or going for shock value.

It's okay. We won!!!! MUUUHHHAAAAAAAAA!!!!! MUUUUHHHHAAAAA!!!!"
Et tu, Micah?


The Prince of Thorns does feature an antihero protagonist. You may even find the euthanizing protagonists of The Killing Moon disquieting enough to root for.
I believe the The Day of the Jackal features a villain, and the tension revolves around hoping the villain will fail at the end. However, I'm not sure as I haven't read it myself.

Black Sun Rising
Crown of Shadows
When True Night Falls
I think here you'll find several nice shades of grey rather than the ..."
I really enjoyed those books.

Black Sun Rising
Crown of Shadows
When True Night Falls
I think here you'll find several nice shades of grey rather than the ..."
Such an incredibly good series. The opening of the first book was the first time in my life where I closed the book, put it down and walked away, unable to process yet what had just happened.

I'd suggest The Hammer for a good starting point - it is self-contained.
My favorites are the Engineer Trilogy, but I can see it boring and pissing off a lot of people.
Parker's books are all fantasy, but none of them (that I've read) have any trace of magic, the supernatural, or even much religion. There are no dragons or fantastic creatures. They are like an alternate history Earth where history diverged somewhere in the stone age and everything is different, but the same.

I'd suggest The Hammer for a good starting point - it is self-contained.
My favorites are the Engineer Trilogy, but I can see it boring and pissing off a lot of people.
Parker's books are all fantasy, but none of them (that I've read) have any trace of magic, the supernatural, or even much religion. There are no dragons or fantastic creatures. They are like an alternate history Earth where history diverged somewhere in the stone age and everything is different, but the same.

I agree with everyone who has mentioned C.S. Friedman's Coldfire Trilogy ( Black Sun Rising, Crown of Shadows, When True Night Falls )
I also really like Brandon Sanderson's Mistborn: The Final Empire. The typical fantasy plot you outlined (a nobody becomes a hero and saves the world from evil) has already happened, before the story even begins. However, the bad guy won. So picture an oppressed people, enslaved to the "Lord Ruler" (the bad guy from the pre-story story) who is pretty much immortal with the power of a god. Ash falls from the sky, life is bleak, etc. Not only do I like the idea, the book itself is great. I read the other two in the trilogy and liked them a lot too, but the first book is by far the best in my opinion.


Definitely. Some people find him too grimmdark, but I like the shades of grey and his subversion of many standard fantasy tropes. This is the sort of series where everyone is, basically, some kind of bad guy.

I love that word. I thought only 'requireshate' girl used it.

Also, Villains by Necessity was a fun little book that came out around the time Dragonlance and Terry Brooks were really popular, and sets itself up as a humourous inversion of those kinds of stories. There was a great battle between Good and Evil 200 years ago, and Good triumphed. And now the world is steadily "subliming", and will fade away unless the Balance is restored by reintroducing Evil into the world. So the world's last assassin, last thief, last sorceress of a cannibal race, and a black knight are recruited by a druidess to free the Sealed Evil in a Can and restore balance to the world.


I love that word. I thought only 'requireshate' girl used it."
Maybe that's who coined it? I don't read her blog (I can't take that much hate!) but I've been seeing that term pop up a lot, recently.

Æ wrote: "I believe the The Day of the Jackal features a villain, and the tension revolves around hoping the villain will fail at the end. However, I'm not sure as I haven't read it myself."
I'd call Day of the Jackal a "cat and mouse" thriller. Most of the book alternates between the titular assassin's exacting preparations for the job he was hired to do, and a humble French detective's efforts to track him down and stop him. On the one hand, you want the detective to succeed. On the other hand, the Jackal is such a consummate professional with such intricate plans you're almost rooting for him. In a larger sense, both men are dedicated professionals with a strong sense of duty (or in the case of the Jackal, pride in his work), being used as tools by men far less noble than they are.





I like you, Tamahome, but I swear by Odin's missing eye that if you bring up that unholy title again in this sanctuary, I will smite you with thunder and dinosaurs.

Æ wrote: "Tamahome wrote: "I hear it has 50 shades of grey."
I like you, Tamahome, but I swear by Odin's missing eye that if you bring up that unholy title again in this sanctuary, I will smite you with thunder and dinosaurs. "
You'll get so angry your face will go Fifty Shades Darker ;-)
I like you, Tamahome, but I swear by Odin's missing eye that if you bring up that unholy title again in this sanctuary, I will smite you with thunder and dinosaurs. "
You'll get so angry your face will go Fifty Shades Darker ;-)

I like you, Tamahome, but I swear by Odin's missing eye that if you bring up that unholy title again in this sanctuary, I will smite yo..."
If you want the audio book version, check out Gilbert Gottfried: Gilbert Gottfried reads 50 Shades of Grey" (NSFW, or your mental health)

It does have some of that stereotypical genre stuff but by the time i'd finished it I realised that it had mocked and reversed almost every single one of the predictable cliches it had played on.
Evil doesn't necessarily win, but its not exactly a win for good either.
Books mentioned in this topic
Tigana (other topics)Dawn (other topics)
Dusk (other topics)
Grendel (other topics)
Villains by Necessity (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Louise Cooper (other topics)Tim Lebbon (other topics)
Karl Edward Wagner (other topics)
K.J. Parker (other topics)
K.J. Parker (other topics)
So my question to other readers, do you know of any books where it is the opposite? E.g. follow the 'good' hero, but in the end gets slain and evil wins? Or a book where we see it from evil's perspective?