SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
A Scanner Darkly
Group Reads Discussions 2012
>
"A Scanner Darkly" Finished (Spoilered Allowed)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kevin
(last edited Jun 08, 2012 03:45PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jun 08, 2012 03:42PM

reply
|
flag


In short, I recommend the audiobook. The narrator is very good, with distinctive character voices. I think that the style and prose of this book fit just right in audio form. I might not have liked it quite as much by just reading it.



I have that quote from the afterword pinned up on my desk ... the paragraph that begins "drug misuse is not a disease, it is a decision."

I've read only Androids by Dick, but it was a long time ago. This one I had to force myself to read the first four chapters or to page 54. I got it about surveillance, drugs fracturing the self, but the one thing that made me sit up and notice was when Bob saw that gas was $1.10 per gallon.
That was science fiction!



I liked it. But I don't buy the basic premise that Bob/Fred/Bruce would take Substance D since they knew it bifurcated the brain. Wasn't he a cop, faking being a druggie? He was taking other drugs, which while he enjoyed, would alone would have given him access. Why would Fred addict himself to Substance D when he knew upfront that it took a hit or two to become incurable addicted and it led invariably to permanent brain damage? Fred's behavior was more like a druggie who had been co-opted into being a narc. Why would an on-the-job dedicated narc take a drug like Substance D? It is a bit like willingly drinking cyanide so your cop friends could follow your body to the funeral home for an investigation. Or was it he took Substance D, by accident? If he didn't know he was taking it.....but I didn't have that impression.
What did I miss?


1. Tensely exerted inquiries into compact phenomena of experience, sometimes to a beautiful result in the prose. This novel delivers many intervals of literary bliss as Dick squeezes various features of his regime to estimate their nature. Check out the imaginary flies!
2. The referential loop. In this case it's signaled by the title itself, and you can't exit the story without confronting its recursive scheme.
Bob Arctor is spying on himself, but Dick contrives to amplify just the character of his surveillance, letting the rest of the story develop in this constantly narrowing reverberation of object and observation. "If a scanner sees darkly," he warns... then self-revelation will converge to nihilistic nothing with the inevitability of a mathematical limit--the teleological mirror gone blinding black.
I was trapped like Arctor when this book came to me, and it said the only thing I really needed to hear: Follow the light!


The German bits I have looked up have been Goethe poems, Goethe's Faust, and an opera called Fidelio, Fidelio: English National Opera Guide 4.

-“Far out,” Fred said, “I can dig it. Thanks, man.”
-“Hey, Donna, this is a buddy of Bob’s, you know? Hey, man, he’s in a bad way, I’m not jiving you. Hey, he—” I can dig it, two voices thought inside his mind
-From the box of tapes on the floor of the car she took the Carole King Tapestry tape, her favorite of all she had, and pushed it into the tape deck
-stealing bottles of Coca-Cola off the truck
I didn't really enjoy it; too difficult for me to keep stringing the pieces together to achieve a narrative story. Like if Fred/Bob are the main characters, why did he/they only show up halfway through Chapter 3? He was not also Charlie Freck.
I got some themes: paranoia, distrust, questioning reality. Cynical ending with New-Path's farm. So, even though people think Substance-D is wholly synthetic, actually the new-agey rehab centers are growing it?!
Books mentioned in this topic
Faust (other topics)Fidelio: English National Opera Guide 4 (other topics)