Stephen King Fans discussion

This topic is about
In the Tall Grass
Short Stories & Collections
>
In The Tall Grass
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Joanie
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jun 12, 2012 10:00AM

reply
|
flag



Also - the Jun-Jul edition that contains part one has a short Q+A with father and son about the process of writing the story.




I'm not really sure what the hell to make of this story. On the one hand I liked it, on the other hand I...don't even know. I'm not sure if I missed something, but I'm not sure if the end has a deeper meaning or if it's just what it written (sorry for being vague, but I don't want to get into a crazy amount of spoiers).

I'm not really sure what the hell to make of this story. On the one hand I liked it, on the other hand I...don't even know. I'm not sure i..."
Thank you, Christopher.

I don't even know.
But worth reading."
Well said :D"
Lol seriously. I'm not going to even add to that.


Good, I'm glad to hear that.

Part 2 I just finished reading. My response to it, and to the story as a whole now, is... meh. It didn't have the same sense of creepiness the first part did; instead, the mystery of the grass and the skulking unknown elements all combining in a somewhat unique way (well, if you've read The Ruins this isn't too different in many respects) gave way to a lame cultish horror cliche. It just didn't have the same weight as part 1 did. It was gorier, and more raw than part 1. But the overall effect was somehow less than I was hoping for.




I'm not really sure what the hell to make of this story. On the one hand I liked it, on the other hand I...don't even know. I'm not sure i..."
I read In the Tall Grass last night, and I'm with you. It started off really well, but then, for me the end was just, "What? That's it?" Like you, I don't know if there was something I missed or what, but I gave it 3.5 stars, mainly because the first part was pretty good. Second half...heh. Um. Like the other Chris said....worth the read.
