Struggling Writers discussion
*Archives *
>
Flashback or not?
date
newest »



Jen wrote: "In the story I'm writing my characters have just met a man who is about to reveal very important information that will act as the springboard for the rest of the story (at least that's the concept ..."
flash backs are better. but if it's a mystery story or detective story i am pretty sure that might not be what your readers need to here. if its suspense only leave out the smaller facts. otherwise maybe the flashback is okay. your choice:)
flash backs are better. but if it's a mystery story or detective story i am pretty sure that might not be what your readers need to here. if its suspense only leave out the smaller facts. otherwise maybe the flashback is okay. your choice:)


@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is telling the other characters about something that happened to him years ago and like I said he's so soft spoken and meek that he wouldn't give a fully fleshed summary of the story, but just important details. Without the details, though, I'm wondering if the story sounds "too convenient" if that makes sense.
@Irene: When I was writing the first draft I immediately wrote the flashback version because that was much more fun and easier to write. I think maybe I could write it with just the dialogue today and see what my family and I like better.

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is telling the other characters about..."
Lol I sometimes have to rewrite my prologue, like on the last novel and on the House of Death too! My story is moved 7 years into the future right after the prologue so I have no choice.

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is telling the other characters about..."
Maybem something dramatic happens to him that triggers the memory and some how he ends up telling about it all infront of a bunch of people?

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is telling the other char..."
Yeah I have a prologue for this story too. Originally it was different but then I realized I had to rewrite it. :p

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is telling the other char..."
Hmmm well I don't think he's that kind of character, you know? The thing is the character who's telling this story is a bit reluctant to tell it, so his son brings the main characters to him and asks him to tell the story. The man telling the story suffered a severe trauma and didn't speak for years, and now he's just starting to talk again and all the secrets are coming out.

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is tellin..."
What kind of story are you writing? :)

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character is telling ..."
Just a thought, and here's another. Sometimes when someone has a flashback that meets the medical term flashback (such as seen as those with PTSD) they can not control the memories that invade thier thoughts or what they say/do. Not always does it invoke comprehensible speech but sometimes it does.

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. They character..."
That's interesting. The flashback in this story would be for the reader's benefit. Since the characters would be told the story firsthand they wouldn't actually be witnessing the flashback. If they aren't actually witnessing the flashback, only being told the story should I cut the flashback out? Is it okay to keep the flashback, even if it's not part of the characters' experience? I just feel like it's more interesting with a flashback. I hope this makes sense to you and I'm not confusing you all lol.

@Ingrid: It's a high fantasy story. ..."
Right. IF it is in first person then the readers would be inside your characters head as it happens so they se it. If it is not in first person I have no idea, I guess you should probably cut it.

like...
[i] His eyes were wild and blood shot, his mouth contorted in feral rage [/i]
"He didn't look pleased," said the character
just a thought.

I get that you don't want to travel "old ground" in new story, but, that's not really the point of a flashback is it? I mean, has anyone (readers) seen, or read that information somewhere else in the story? Is it a recap of some historical event that everybody is familiar with? Most of the time I flash back, the flash back is as much "historical fiction" as the main setting of the novel is current action.
Last time I checked, historical Fiction is a valid genre or category of fiction. Why not within the same book.
I'd say this. If you want examples of how to flash back, read some Tim Powers. I particularly like Declare the entire book is a collection of flashbacks. Or maybe Katherine Kerr's "Eight."
I think the main idea is that you have to decide if the back story is compelling enough to give equal billing to the current story (or greater priority). Sometimes the flashback has the best parts of the story.
If you write a story that jumps from present to past and back regularly, if you can confuse readers. (again, it is important that it's a fresh story (or part of the story) just set in the characters past, and if it should have the same priority and importance in the readers minds as the story thread in the present, less, or more.
Does what happen in the past directly effect the story thread in the present? I mean, you could write great adventure about the guys child hood adventures and how that "Shaped him." But does that really matter? How many lines or pages is that worth (even if it is fresh story).
Yet, I think if your worried about too much flash back. Try reading just the flash backs... if they make a good story and read, and are directly important to the present story thread... don't get hung up on silly thumb rules about flashing back or not. Just write it. At worst you can have a pre-quill just waiting to be released after the main story is a big hit right?
(again, the flash back should be story, not filler or, solely used for the purposes of explaining things in the story present if you want more of it in your writing. If all you want to do is give some explanation and understanding of what's going on with the characters, then less may be more. (better a good scene where they all gather at the bar telling stories than a flash back).
If the flash back is as open and "Fresh" and captivating as the main setting of the story...then, I don't think you can have "too many flash backs."

I loved that book Jamaica Inn too!

Dreams
Once I dreamed that I could fly
and in my dream I flew."
Like the little sparrows nesting in my garage, they dreamed they could fly, some of them prematurely unfortunately for them. Sad, their numbers are declining rapidly, they made a hell of a mess my freezer was right underneath the nesting place and I had to cover it with plastic!

Dreams
Once I dreamed that I could fly
and in my dream I flew."
Like the little sparrows nesting in my garage, they dreamed they could fly, some..."
Something tells me we need to practice focusing on the spirit of the rule, not so much the messy details of following through with it... nuts and bolts always get messy...I'd rather interpret clouds ...sometimes.


I actually wrote the scene without the flashback and found that it was much better after all. I have the flashback scene saved just in case but for now I'm sticking with the present day version
If I use the flashback it's good because it's a more exciting way of telling the story and the character telling it is extremely quiet, soft spoken, and I just think a flashback would be much more interesting.
But I know flashbacks tend to be avoided because "it's old news" and I guess if the man is telling a brief, watered down version to the characters then the reader should have the same experience? Also just having present dialogue is much faster. I'm leaning toward not doing the flashback but I'd like some input :]