All things Philosophical. discussion
Anthological Discussions
>
Metaphysics
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mark, The Failed Philosopher
(last edited Jul 05, 2012 09:08AM)
(new)
Jul 05, 2012 06:22AM

reply
|
flag

Re-read your Plato...this is exactly what his 'real' entailed without the angels and God obviously. Then if you want those thrown in then read your Aquinas and Augustine.

I'm not talking about a realm of forms.
Let's take this point from the concept of creation. Anything I could ever create would be less real than I am. I could make a doll (form without function, essence, etc.). I could imagine a hero more powerful than Superman (without substance, physicality). Laws of entropy dictate that I cannot create (there's a difference between creation and design) anything more real than I am.
Again, I'm not saying it's the most earth-shattering idea. It's just something I've been thinking about.

Joel wrote: "I've read them all. And I know the discourse.
I'm not talking about a realm of forms.
Let's take this point from the concept of creation. Anything I could ever create would be less real than I am..."
Anybody else start thinking about The Ontological Argument when they read this post? I mean with this post as an answer to it rather than something that either refutes or supports the idea.
I'm not talking about a realm of forms.
Let's take this point from the concept of creation. Anything I could ever create would be less real than I am..."
Anybody else start thinking about The Ontological Argument when they read this post? I mean with this post as an answer to it rather than something that either refutes or supports the idea.

