date
newest »

message 1:
by
ML
(new)
Nov 21, 2013 07:10PM

reply
|
flag



Snobs don't have standards; they have expectations. ;)



I am a self proclaimed book snob. I dislike most of the popular books (Girl on the Train, Gone Girl-you get the idea). I would never ever think of discouraging anyone from reading. However if I ask you what type of book you like to read and the response is "murder mysteries", or Nicholas Sparks, I will tactfully change the subject. I loved every word, every sentence, and every character in your book The Humans....
Don't judge.

Some of the comments here seem to have missed your point, which is to read what you like. We don't have to read every piece of careless rubbish out there in order to avoid being book snobs. We can still have our personal standards. OUR standards, not someone else's.
And thank you for your wonderfully honest interview with Bryony Gordon on her podcast. I will now pick up your books, because they will be enjoyed.

But then you succeeded in writing a funny sentence, so treat yourself to a peanut butter sandwich and a glass of white wine.
24. I used to be a snob. It made me unhappy.
I suspect many people become snobs because they're already unhappy.


3 years later I'm discovering this thread... and I can't agree enough about that word trashy being used to describe lots of mainstream fiction, especially areas that are primarily both written and consumed by women. To say that I hate the term is putting it mildly.
I have to say that I agree with virtually everything that Matt Haig has said in this blog post, and in particular
3. If something is popular it can still be good. Just ask Shakespeare. Or the Beatles. Or peanut butter.but do take exception to
14. Books are not better for being misunderstood, any more than a building is better for having no door.
17. Freedom is a process of knocking down walls. Tyranny is a process of building them.
8. It does not matter about who the author is. The only thing a book should be judged on is the words inside.
There are some of us that are unable or more to the point unwilling to separate the art from its creator for reasons such as virulent hate towards various groups of people that are different to themselves, or whom they "disagree" with such as females, queers and POC's amongst others. Or those that partake in various heinous crimes against other humans which has sometimes included their own children. There are even some 'artists' who try to copyright common words used in certain genres and then try to sue their peers for using the same word in their own novels prior to the copyright claim.
Whether the artist is still alive or now dead, some of us retain the right to choose not to support the work that was created at the same time as perpetuating various levels of hatred, crime or even just bad behavior against others.
I do believe that one of Mr Haig's rules should be to not judge others on their reasons for choosing or not choosing to consume to works of certain artists, even if it is nothing to do with the work itself. Afterall, there are plenty of other readers out there who will just ignore those issues and pay for and consume the works, and that is their right too.


I am a librarian. I buy books for my library district in Colorado. Your points about not being a book snob are wonderful.
I am one of the few librarians I know who admits she loves romances. One time a patron came to my desk and asked me to help her find some romances. She was told that I liked them--by a condescending book snob. I found some of my favorites for her. The woman told me that her seven-year old son had died the week before, and she needed something to give her a little bit of happiness. That is a true story. It's why when I buy books, I always try to envision the people who will love reading them.
I just finished The Midnight Library. I have been so depressed during COVID. Your book made a huge difference to me. I wrote down the line "Librarians are like soul-enhanced search engines." I changed careers twenty years ago. It felt like becoming a librarian was what I was always meant to do, but that I needed to do other things first to find the best job, one with a great purpose. Thank you so much.
Alice

READ MIDNIGHT LIBRARY!! I have been in an increasingly dark place for several months.
I think Todd Haig saved my life today.

People read for different reasons: some to be inspired, educated, or entertained, some to relax or escape. So- definitely no judgement. People should read what they love but maybe try to stretch a little sometimes too.
Graphic novels are probably the books I hear most often abused by people who come into the library, as in "I want books for my kid to read- s/he likes those comic books, but I want him/her to read REAL books." This makes me especially sad because: (1) Kids who like graphic novels are often at that fragile age where they may turn off books altogether if not allowed to pursue their own interests. Studies show kids are more likely to pursue reading when they get to choose their own material. And (2) there are some beautifully conceived and realized graphic novels wherein the visuals complement the text to a magical extent- these are so deserving of attention, not dismissal. (And some are just laugh-out-loud funny, and who doesn't need a laugh?)
But I digress- in short, "no" to book snobbery- but also please don't refer to people who genuinely prefer literary fiction or classics as snobs because they also have a right to find joy in their tomes of choice without shame. Personally, I tend to gravitate towards literary fiction or nonfiction most often, but have found great reading pleasure in everything from scifi to picture books. Quality isn't limited to any one genre- know what you like, but also explore a little!




Leo lo que quiero, lo que deseo y no prejuzgo. Y dejo los libros con los que me aburro.
Cada uno lee lo que quiere.
Me gusta mucho esta lista y me la guardé.

I love books. They are everywhere in my home. I haven't read all the books that I own; I don't think I ever will. But, it's a comfort just to have them.
I don't see book snobbery. The author doesn't know who will read her creation or what the reader will take away from the book. Whether its being read by members of a book club, or by someone who picked up the paperback for 25 cents at a yard sale.
In fact, I see reading as the great equalizer. A high school dropout can connect with Shakespeare, or Harper Lee, or Dan Brown... maybe all three.
As we grow and change we read the same material differently. I love To Kill a Mockingbird. I first read it in high school; I've seen the movie version several times; I reread To Kill a Mockingbird 30 years later; I saw Aaron Sorkin's version on Broadway. It's the same story, but its different each time I connect with it.
Instead of using To Kill a Mockingbird to make that point, I could have said something about War and Peace, or Pride and Prejudice, or The Red and the Black. Would one of these have made me a snob? Well, maybe the Red and the Black.
Reading is generally a solitary activity. No one has to know what you are reading unless you share the information.
Snobbery isn't about books, its about the snob. What do I wear, or drive? Where do I live? Where do I vacation? What wine do I drink? Snobbery is about insecurity, and lack of self confidence. It is form over substance. Reading is the opposite, it is substance over form.
These are just some thoughts of a lifetime reader.


I just started reading The Midnight Library, and I'm loving it. Thank you, Matt Haig---I'm glad you are now on my radar.

Hmmm, I hear you, and I've ripped a few such authors apart in my reviews, but freedom of speech is a right that I hold very sacred and it upsets me when I read about schools banning books etc.
Make your voice heard in opposition, by all means. We can be such Stupid Humans, but sometimes we learn from our mistakes. Tolerance can't be doled out in half measures, but I do understand your anger and unhappiness. Change is slow to come - we can't erase their hateful thinking and force them to be more tolerant, alas.



Thus was really uplifting, especially after having to listen to some real-life booksnobs earlier.
Your books helped me through.
Thansfor doing what you do.


N.B. A book can be good, but it doesn’t mean it’s literature.
Discuss.
☺️

I think the whole snobism in books thing is very old. The first printed books where only something rich people could buy ( often they couldnt even read the books they owned ). Later, in Victorian times Bibliomania broke out anew. Suddenly people profiled and measured their wealth and worth in rare books to brag about at the clubs, even if they never read them!
Nowadays many young readers get repelled by schools forceing them to read books they dont want to, wich only makes matters worse.
Thank you again! I have some friends who really need to hear this too.
