Lsharathkumar

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Lsharathkumar.


Adventures in 3-D...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Sensitive is the ...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Being Different: ...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
See all 208 books that Lsharathkumar is reading…
Loading...
Vikram Sampath
“Diagnosing this alleged antipathy of the Muslims, he elaborated: The Moslems in general and Indian Moslems in particular have not as yet grown out of the historical stage, of intense religiosity and the theological concept of state. Their theology and theocratical [sic] politics divide the human world into two groups only—The Moslem land and the enemy land. All lands which are either entirely inhabited by the Moslems or are ruled over by the Moslems are Moslem lands. All lands, which are mostly inhabited by non-Moslem power are enemy lands and no faithful Moslem is allowed to bear any loyalty to them and is called upon to do everything in his power by policy or force or fraud to convert the non-Moslem there to Moslem faith, to bring about its political conquest by a Moslem power. It is no good quoting sentences here or there from Moslem theological books to prove the contrary. Read the whole book to know its trend. And again it is not with books that we are concerned here but with the followers of the book and how they translate them in practice. You will then see that the whole Moslem history and their daily actions are framed on the design I have outlined above. Consequently, a territorial patriotism is a word unknown to the Moslem—nay is tabooed, unless in connection with a Moslem territory. Afghans can be patriots for Afghanisthan is a Moslem territory today. But an Indian Moslem if he is a real Moslem—and they are intensely religious as a people—cannot faithfully bear loyalty to India as a country, as a nation, as a State, because it is today ‘an Enemy Land’ and doubly lost; for non-Moslems are in a majority here and to boot it is not ruled by any Moslem power, Moslem sovereign. Add to this that of all non-Moslems the Hindus are looked upon as the most damned by Moslem theologians. For Christians and Jews are after all ‘Kitabis’, having the holy books partially in common. But the Hindus are totally ‘Kafirs’ as a consequence their land ‘Hindusthan’ is pre-eminently an ‘enemy’ and as long as it is not ruled by Moslems or all Hindus do not embrace Islam . . . What wonder then that the Muslim League should openly declare its intention to join hands with non-Indian alien Moslem countries rather than with Indian Hindus in forming a Moslem Federation? They could not be accused from their point of view of being traitors to Hindusthan. Their conscience was clear. They never looked upon our today’s ‘Hindusthan’ as their country, nation. It is to them already an alien land, and enemy land—‘a Dar-ul-Harb’ and not a ‘Dar-ul-Islam!!”
Vikram Sampath, Savarkar: A Contested Legacy, 1924-1966

Vikram Sampath
“enemy”
Vikram Sampath, Savarkar: A Contested Legacy, 1924-1966

S.L. Bhyrappa
“Awards get their value from the person—the person doesn’t become great because he has bagged awards.”
Translated by Sandeep Balakrishna S.L. Bhyrappa, Aavarana: The Veil

S.L. Bhyrappa
“Realization comes when we honestly accept the mistakes of the past and that automatically builds the responsibility that will prevent us from repeating those same mistakes.”
S.L. Bhyrappa, Aavarana: The Veil

Vikram Sampath
“Elaborating on the accusation made on the Hindu Mahasabha of being a communal organization and a mirror image of the Muslim League, he said: The fact is that Nationalism and Communalism are in themselves either equally justifiable and humane or not. Nationalism when it is aggressive is as immoral in human relation as is Communalism when it tries to suppress the equitable rights of other communities and tries to usurp all to itself. But when Communalism is only defensive, it is as justifiable and humane as an equitable Nationalism itself. The Hindu nationalists do not aim to usurp what belongs to others. Therefore, even if they be called Hindu communalists they are justifiably so and are about the only real Indian Nationalist. For, a real and justifiable Indian Nationalism must be equitable to all communities that compose the Indian Nation. But for the same reason the Moslems alone are communalists in an unjustifiable, anti-national and treacherous sense of the term. For it is they who want to usurp to themselves all that belongs to others. The Indian National Congress only condemns itself as an anti-national body when it calls in the same breath the Hindu Mahasabha and the Muslim League as bodies equally communal in the reprehensible or treacherous sense of that term. Consequently if to defend the just and equitable rights of Hindus in their own land is communalism then we are communalists par excellence and glory in being the most devoted Hindu communalists which to us means being the truest and the most equitable Indian Nationalists!”
Vikram Sampath, Savarkar: A Contested Legacy, 1924-1966

142309 Underground Knowledge — A discussion group — 23661 members — last activity Sep 04, 2025 09:35PM
This global discussion group has been designed to encourage debates about important and underreported issues of our era. All you need is an enquiring ...more
year in books
Nishu T...
1,453 books | 105 friends

Ajay
708 books | 144 friends

Chandan...
128 books | 63 friends

Shalini
229 books | 75 friends

Rajat U...
145 books | 101 friends

Abhijit...
292 books | 7 friends

Mostlyd...
157 books | 28 friends

Amoghav...
73 books | 241 friends

More friends…


Polls voted on by Lsharathkumar

Lists liked by Lsharathkumar